| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
| |
Ref: https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-template-for-your-repository
|
|
|
|
| |
Also remove "Component Name" section from the PR template as components
are automatically detected by the bot from the list of changed files.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Clean up markdown
* Add pymarkdown sanity test for core
* Update unit test SHA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change:
- Remove "New Module Pull Request" since we're not taking new modules in
ansible/ansible
- Add "Tests Pull Request" to use for things like adding coverage that
aren't bugfixes.
Signed-off-by: Rick Elrod <rick@elrod.me>
|
|
|
|
| |
While important for issues, it adds almost no value for PRs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Improve GitHub templates
The existing templates are basically a copy for each type of issue (bug,
feature, doc) whereas we can make the template more specific to the task
at hand.
This PR includes:
- More specific sections depending on the type of issue
- More concise and direct instructions (NO NEED FOR FRUSTRATION CAPS!)
- Single-line comments (no need to guide people to avoid wrong edits)
- Improved paste area
- Better headings/titles
- No 'Summary' title for PRs (so commit information is placed correctly)
This PR would require some improvements to Ansibot.
* Remove controversial Ansibot stuff
Make it easier to get the first batch merged.
* Restore ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md
* Incorporate reviewer suggestions
* Make OS / ENVIRONMENT doc-related
* Rephrase Ansibot-related message
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Try and reduce people typing in the comments section
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If a user makes a PR with a single, detailed commit message, github will
put that at the top of the PR. Move our summary field to the top of
the PR template so that it is next to where the commit message is
placed. Users can then easily merge the two together or supplement the
commit message with additional information that we ask for.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Remove legacy GitHub templates.
* Remove references to module repos.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
In hindsight, I think it is better to have empty code-blocks
then comment placeholders when people don't replace those sections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Instruct to verify if an issue/request already exists
- Use uppercase for titles (easier to parse as titles)
- Remove empty lines where it makes sense (instructions)
- Ensure that commit-message appears directly under summary (pull-requests)
|
|
In essence, most people do not need to use the templates directly,
getting them out of the way increases the signal-to-noise ratio of
the root directory. Direct people to what they are looking for.
|