summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorManoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>2022-10-25 09:43:10 +0200
committerManoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>2022-10-25 09:43:10 +0200
commit0022611fb729c6d53ff2efa3f77254ff07fbe0a4 (patch)
treefd23213bc00706706ae27fd077fa5db4488f8090 /ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c
parentMerge pull request #11673 from cscarpitta/srv6-per-vrf-sid (diff)
downloadfrr-0022611fb729c6d53ff2efa3f77254ff07fbe0a4.tar.xz
frr-0022611fb729c6d53ff2efa3f77254ff07fbe0a4.zip
ospf6d: Fix for memory leak issues in ospf6.
Problem: Multiple memory leaks in ospf6. 260 ==6637== 32 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 5 of 24 261 ==6637== at 0x4C31FAC: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:762) 262 ==6637== by 0x4E8A1BF: qcalloc (memory.c:111) 263 ==6637== by 0x11EE27: ospf6_summary_add_aggr_route_and_blackhole (ospf6_asbr.c:2779) 264 ==6637== by 0x11EEBA: ospf6_originate_new_aggr_lsa (ospf6_asbr.c:2811) 265 ==6637== by 0x4E7C6A7: hash_clean (hash.c:325) 266 ==6637== by 0x11FA93: ospf6_handle_external_aggr_update (ospf6_asbr.c:3164) 267 ==6637== by 0x11FA93: ospf6_asbr_summary_process (ospf6_asbr.c:3386) 268 ==6637== by 0x4EB739B: thread_call (thread.c:1692) 269 ==6637== by 0x4E85B17: frr_run (libfrr.c:1068) 270 ==6637== by 0x119535: main (ospf6_main.c:228) 356 ==6637== 240 bytes in 12 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 13 of 24 357 ==6637== at 0x4C2FE96: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:309) 358 ==6637== by 0x4E8A0DA: qmalloc (memory.c:106) 359 ==6637== by 0x13545C: ospf6_lsa_alloc (ospf6_lsa.c:724) 360 ==6637== by 0x1354E3: ospf6_lsa_create_headeronly (ospf6_lsa.c:756) 361 ==6637== by 0x1355F2: ospf6_lsa_copy (ospf6_lsa.c:790) 362 ==6637== by 0x13B58B: ospf6_dbdesc_recv_slave (ospf6_message.c:976) 363 ==6637== by 0x13B58B: ospf6_dbdesc_recv (ospf6_message.c:1038) 364 ==6637== by 0x13B58B: ospf6_read_helper (ospf6_message.c:1838) 365 ==6637== by 0x13B58B: ospf6_receive (ospf6_message.c:1875) 366 ==6637== by 0x4EB739B: thread_call (thread.c:1692) 367 ==6637== by 0x4E85B17: frr_run (libfrr.c:1068) 368 ==6637== by 0x119535: main (ospf6_main.c:228) RCA: 1. when the ospf6 area is being deleted, the neighbor related information was not being cleaned up. 2. when aggr route gets deleted from rt_aggr_tbl the corrsponding summary route attched to the aggr route was not being deleted. Fix: Added the ospf6_neighbor_delete in ospf6_area_delete to free the neighbor related information and added ospf6_route_delete while freeing external aggr route to free the summary route. Signed-off-by: Manoj Naragund <mnaragund@vmware.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c')
-rw-r--r--ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c b/ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c
index ae3ce2f0c..924c2d6c5 100644
--- a/ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c
+++ b/ospf6d/ospf6_asbr.c
@@ -3169,6 +3169,14 @@ void ospf6_external_aggregator_free(struct ospf6_external_aggr_rt *aggr)
hash_clean(aggr->match_extnl_hash,
ospf6_aggr_unlink_external_info);
+ if (aggr->route) {
+ if (aggr->route->route_option)
+ XFREE(MTYPE_OSPF6_EXTERNAL_INFO,
+ aggr->route->route_option);
+
+ ospf6_route_delete(aggr->route);
+ }
+
if (IS_OSPF6_DEBUG_AGGR)
zlog_debug("%s: Release the aggregator Address(%pFX)",
__func__,