summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLakshman Krishnamoorthy <lkrishnamoor@vmware.com>2019-05-29 23:32:08 +0200
committerLakshman Krishnamoorthy <lkrishnamoor@vmware.com>2019-05-30 20:21:28 +0200
commiteadd168781d31a282b601735241fd83adb2cace0 (patch)
tree9625bc578097aa556517283c95288528db20f393 /tools
parentMerge pull request #4402 from chiragshah6/evpn_dev1 (diff)
downloadfrr-eadd168781d31a282b601735241fd83adb2cace0.tar.xz
frr-eadd168781d31a282b601735241fd83adb2cace0.zip
lib: Introducing a 3rd state for route-map match cmd: RMAP_NOOP
Introducing a 3rd state for route_map_apply library function: RMAP_NOOP Traditionally route map MATCH rule apis were designed to return a binary response, consisting of either RMAP_MATCH or RMAP_NOMATCH. (Route-map SET rule apis return RMAP_OKAY or RMAP_ERROR). Depending on this response, the following statemachine decided the course of action: Action: Apply route-map match and return the result (RMAP_MATCH/RMAP_NOMATCH) State1: Receveived RMAP_MATCH THEN: If Routemap type is PERMIT, execute other rules if applicable, otherwise we PERMIT! Else: If Routemap type is DENY, we DENYMATCH right away State2: Received RMAP_NOMATCH, continue on to next route-map, otherwise, return DENYMATCH by default if nothing matched. With reference to PR 4078 (https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/pull/4078), we require a 3rd state because of the following situation: The issue - what if, the rule api needs to abort or ignore a rule?: "match evpn vni xx" route-map filter can be applied to incoming routes regardless of whether the tunnel type is vxlan or mpls. This rule should be N/A for mpls based evpn route, but applicable to only vxlan based evpn route. Today, the filter produces either a match or nomatch response regardless of whether it is mpls/vxlan, resulting in either permitting or denying the route.. So an mpls evpn route may get filtered out incorrectly. Eg: "route-map RM1 permit 10 ; match evpn vni 20" or "route-map RM2 deny 20 ; match vni 20" With the introduction of the 3rd state, we can abort this rule check safely. How? The rules api can now return RMAP_NOOP (or another enum) to indicate that it encountered an invalid check, and needs to abort just that rule, but continue with other rules. Question: Do we repurpose an existing enum RMAP_OKAY or RMAP_ERROR as the 3rd state (or create a new enum like RMAP_NOOP)? RMAP_OKAY and RMAP_ERROR are used to return the result of set cmd. We chose to go with RMAP_NOOP (but open to ideas), as a way to bypass the rmap filter As a result we have a 3rd state: State3: Received RMAP_NOOP Then, proceed to other route-map, otherwise return RMAP_PERMITMATCH by default. Signed-off-by:Lakshman Krishnamoorthy <lkrishnamoor@vmware.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions