| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* Solaris doesn't have u_int64_t, so use uint64_t instead. C99-style
fixed-width integers should always be preferred to improve portability;
* 's_addr' is a macro on Solaris, so we can't use it as a variable name.
Rename the 's_addr' variable to 'addr' in the
bgp_peer_conf_if_to_su_update_v4() function.
Signed-off-by: Renato Westphal <renato@opensourcerouting.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
While processing references to the macro PEERAF_FOREACH(), aggressive loop
optimization by gcc 4.9.x (probably 4.8 and greater) was resulting in the
generated code not checking on the index as well as eliminating some code.
This was leading to a dereference of invalid memory when a BGP peer came up.
The fix is to scrap this convoluted macro. Two other changes done are to
eliminate overloading of "afindex" and make the loop iterator an integer.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Olson <olson@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8889
Reviewed By: CCR-4018
Testing Done: Verified failure scenario
Note: This code was added as part of update-groups implementation; when
upstreaming update-groups, this patch should also be included.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8475
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8122
per draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-09:
2.3.2.2.2. BGP ADD-PATH Approach
The [I-D.ietf-idr-add-paths] Internet draft proposes a different
approach to multiple path propagation, by allowing a BGP speaker to
forward multiple paths for the same prefix on a single BGP session.
As [RFC4271] specifies that a BGP listener must implement an implicit
withdraw when it receives an UPDATE message for a prefix which
already exists in its Adj-RIB-In, this approach requires explicit
support for the feature both on the route server and on its clients.
If the ADD-PATH capability is negotiated bidirectionally between the
route server and a route server client, and the route server client
propagates multiple paths for the same prefix to the route server,
then this could potentially cause the propagation of inactive,
invalid or suboptimal paths to the route server, thereby causing loss
of reachability to other route server clients. For this reason, ADD-
PATH implementations on a route server should enforce send-only mode
with the route server clients, which would result in negotiating
receive-only mode from the client to the route server.
This allows us to delete all of the following code:
- All XXXX_rsclient() functions
- peer->rib
- BGP_TABLE_MAIN and BGP_TABLE_RSCLIENT
- RMAP_IMPORT and RMAP_EXPORT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-8114
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivek Venkataraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com
Ticket: CM-8014
This implements addpath TX with the first feature to use it
being "neighbor x.x.x.x addpath-tx-all-paths".
One change to show output is 'show ip bgp x.x.x.x'. If no addpath-tx
features are configured for any peers then everything looks the same
as it is today in that "Advertised to" is at the top and refers to
which peers the bestpath was advertise to.
root@superm-redxp-05[quagga-stash5]# vtysh -c 'show ip bgp 1.1.1.1'
BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.1/32
Paths: (6 available, best #6, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to non peer-group peers:
r1(10.0.0.1) r2(10.0.0.2) r3(10.0.0.3) r4(10.0.0.4) r5(10.0.0.5) r6(10.0.0.6) r8(10.0.0.8)
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
12.12.12.12 (metric 20) from r2(10.0.0.2) (10.0.0.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 8
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:44 2015
[snip]
but once you enable an addpath feature we must display "Advertised to" on a path-by-path basis:
superm-redxp-05# show ip bgp 1.1.1.1/32
BGP routing table entry for 1.1.1.1/32
Paths: (6 available, best #6, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
12.12.12.12 (metric 20) from r2(10.0.0.2) (10.0.0.2)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 8
Advertised to: r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:44 2015
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
34.34.34.34 (metric 20) from r3(10.0.0.3) (10.0.0.3)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 7
Advertised to: r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:39 2015
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
56.56.56.56 (metric 20) from r6(10.0.0.6) (10.0.0.6)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 6
Advertised to: r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:39 2015
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
56.56.56.56 (metric 20) from r5(10.0.0.5) (10.0.0.5)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 5
Advertised to: r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:39 2015
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
34.34.34.34 (metric 20) from r4(10.0.0.4) (10.0.0.4)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 4
Advertised to: r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:39 2015
Local, (Received from a RR-client)
12.12.12.12 (metric 20) from r1(10.0.0.1) (10.0.0.1)
Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
AddPath ID: RX 0, TX 3
Advertised to: r1(10.0.0.1) r2(10.0.0.2) r3(10.0.0.3) r4(10.0.0.4) r5(10.0.0.5) r6(10.0.0.6) r8(10.0.0.8)
Last update: Fri Oct 30 18:26:34 2015
superm-redxp-05#
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
outbound policy anyway
Signed-off-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Vivek Venkataraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Ticket: CM-7933
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
As part of the debian build process for jessie we are seeing
some compile issues. This addresses these issues
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ticket: None
Reviewed by: Trivial
Testing:
A bunch of warnings have crept in to the code base. This
fixes the issue
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
peer, it will only set the nexthop to "self" for non-reflected routes.
To force the nexthop to "self" for reflected routes, a "next-hop self
force" configuration is required. With the introduction of the update
groups function, these two configurations are not distinguished correctly
leading to inconsistent behavior. Resolve by introducing the proper
distinction.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
honored correctly for EBGP peers after the introduction of the
dynamic update groups functionality. Ensure this is handled
correctly. Also, the route-map can separately set different
nexthops - IPv4, IPv6 global or IPv6 link-local; treat these
separately.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This adds support for BGP RFC 5549 (Extended Next Hop Encoding capability)
* send and receive of the capability
* processing of IPv4->IPv6 next-hops
* for resolving these IPv6 next-hops, itsworks with the current
next-hop-tracking support
* added a new message type between BGP and Zebra for such route
install/uninstall
* zserv side of changes to process IPv4 prefix ->IPv6 next-hops
* required show command changes for IPv4 prefix having IPv6 next-hops
Few points to note about the implementation:
* It does an implicit next-hop-self when a [IPv4 prefix -> IPv6 LL next-hop]
is to be considered for advertisement to IPv4 peering (or IPv6 peering
without Extended next-hop capability negotiated)
* Currently feature is off by default, enable it by configuring
'neighbor <> capability extended-nexthop'
* Current support is for IPv4 Unicast prefixes only.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
This patch alone isn't enough to have IPv4->IPv6 routes installed into
the kernel. A separate patch is needed for that to work for the netlink
interface.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Kumar <vipin@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Walton <dwalton@cumulusnetworks.com>
Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
"neighbor x.x.x.x default-originate"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix up some memory leaks found by valgrind
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Remove compile warnings for the bgpd directory
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Reviewed-by:
|
| |
|
|
| |
dynamically add/del the default route if the permit/deny result of the route-map changes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
show update-groups summary was mislabeled. What it displays is not a summary
at all, but the detailed info about all update-groups. Furthermore, there
was no way to get detailed info about a specific subgroup.
This patch renames "show * update-groups summary" to "show * update-groups"
and adds an option to see the info specific to a subgroup only. It also
validates the subgroup-id.
show * update-groups summary will be added separately.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In the data center, where load balancers are announced as VIPs, and eBGP
is used as the routing protocol, this feature is required to ensure that
VIP announcements can be made from anywhere the operator sees fit.
Signed-off-by: Dinesh G Dutt <ddutt@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Venkatraman <vivek@cumulusnetworks.com>
|
|
|
This patch implements the 'update-groups' functionality in BGP. This is a
function that can significantly improve BGP performance for Update generation
and resultant network convergence. BGP Updates are formed for "groups" of
peers and then replicated and sent out to each peer rather than being formed
for each peer. Thus major BGP operations related to outbound policy
application, adj-out maintenance and actual Update packet formation
are optimized.
BGP update-groups dynamically groups peers together based on configuration
as well as run-time criteria. Thus, it is more flexible than update-formation
based on peer-groups, which relies on operator configuration.
[Note that peer-group based update formation has been introduced into BGP by
Cumulus but is currently intended only for specific releases.]
From 11098af65b2b8f9535484703e7f40330a71cbae4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Subject: [PATCH] updgrp commits
|
