summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>2012-07-03 09:09:47 +0200
committerDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>2012-07-16 22:37:15 +0200
commit420962884379bd434a7f643d0936281b2ab4b30c (patch)
tree2570518810ff732c4083833466b2247dd1cd1bf1
parentmtd: mxc_nand: Select the driver via ARCH_MXC (diff)
downloadlinux-420962884379bd434a7f643d0936281b2ab4b30c.tar.xz
linux-420962884379bd434a7f643d0936281b2ab4b30c.zip
mtd: cfi_cmdset_0002: Micron M29EW bugfixes as per TN-13-07
Fix the following issues with Micron's (formerly Numonyx) M29EW NOR flash chips, as documented on TN-13-07: - Correcting Erase Suspend Hang Ups (page 20) - Resolving the Delay After Resume Issue (page 22) Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@keymile.com> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c67
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
index 22d0493a026f..5ff5c4a16943 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_cmdset_0002.c
@@ -431,6 +431,68 @@ static void cfi_fixup_major_minor(struct cfi_private *cfi,
}
}
+static int is_m29ew(struct cfi_private *cfi)
+{
+ if (cfi->mfr == CFI_MFR_INTEL &&
+ ((cfi->device_type == CFI_DEVICETYPE_X8 && (cfi->id & 0xff) == 0x7e) ||
+ (cfi->device_type == CFI_DEVICETYPE_X16 && cfi->id == 0x227e)))
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * From TN-13-07: Patching the Linux Kernel and U-Boot for M29 Flash, page 20:
+ * Some revisions of the M29EW suffer from erase suspend hang ups. In
+ * particular, it can occur when the sequence
+ * Erase Confirm -> Suspend -> Program -> Resume
+ * causes a lockup due to internal timing issues. The consequence is that the
+ * erase cannot be resumed without inserting a dummy command after programming
+ * and prior to resuming. [...] The work-around is to issue a dummy write cycle
+ * that writes an F0 command code before the RESUME command.
+ */
+static void cfi_fixup_m29ew_erase_suspend(struct map_info *map,
+ unsigned long adr)
+{
+ struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
+ /* before resume, insert a dummy 0xF0 cycle for Micron M29EW devices */
+ if (is_m29ew(cfi))
+ map_write(map, CMD(0xF0), adr);
+}
+
+/*
+ * From TN-13-07: Patching the Linux Kernel and U-Boot for M29 Flash, page 22:
+ *
+ * Some revisions of the M29EW (for example, A1 and A2 step revisions)
+ * are affected by a problem that could cause a hang up when an ERASE SUSPEND
+ * command is issued after an ERASE RESUME operation without waiting for a
+ * minimum delay. The result is that once the ERASE seems to be completed
+ * (no bits are toggling), the contents of the Flash memory block on which
+ * the erase was ongoing could be inconsistent with the expected values
+ * (typically, the array value is stuck to the 0xC0, 0xC4, 0x80, or 0x84
+ * values), causing a consequent failure of the ERASE operation.
+ * The occurrence of this issue could be high, especially when file system
+ * operations on the Flash are intensive. As a result, it is recommended
+ * that a patch be applied. Intensive file system operations can cause many
+ * calls to the garbage routine to free Flash space (also by erasing physical
+ * Flash blocks) and as a result, many consecutive SUSPEND and RESUME
+ * commands can occur. The problem disappears when a delay is inserted after
+ * the RESUME command by using the udelay() function available in Linux.
+ * The DELAY value must be tuned based on the customer's platform.
+ * The maximum value that fixes the problem in all cases is 500us.
+ * But, in our experience, a delay of 30 µs to 50 µs is sufficient
+ * in most cases.
+ * We have chosen 500µs because this latency is acceptable.
+ */
+static void cfi_fixup_m29ew_delay_after_resume(struct cfi_private *cfi)
+{
+ /*
+ * Resolving the Delay After Resume Issue see Micron TN-13-07
+ * Worst case delay must be 500µs but 30-50µs should be ok as well
+ */
+ if (is_m29ew(cfi))
+ cfi_udelay(500);
+}
+
struct mtd_info *cfi_cmdset_0002(struct map_info *map, int primary)
{
struct cfi_private *cfi = map->fldrv_priv;
@@ -776,7 +838,10 @@ static void put_chip(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip, unsigned long ad
switch(chip->oldstate) {
case FL_ERASING:
+ cfi_fixup_m29ew_erase_suspend(map,
+ chip->in_progress_block_addr);
map_write(map, cfi->sector_erase_cmd, chip->in_progress_block_addr);
+ cfi_fixup_m29ew_delay_after_resume(cfi);
chip->oldstate = FL_READY;
chip->state = FL_ERASING;
break;
@@ -916,6 +981,8 @@ static void __xipram xip_udelay(struct map_info *map, struct flchip *chip,
/* Disallow XIP again */
local_irq_disable();
+ /* Correct Erase Suspend Hangups for M29EW */
+ cfi_fixup_m29ew_erase_suspend(map, adr);
/* Resume the write or erase operation */
map_write(map, cfi->sector_erase_cmd, adr);
chip->state = oldstate;