summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>2014-12-23 17:28:40 +0100
committerJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>2014-12-23 17:28:40 +0100
commitb792ffe464f64c84c48d51e01c0fecabc4b39579 (patch)
treecd3aa55ad59289c85648b4f969bbb827a25714a6
parentDocs: Mention device tree binding info (diff)
downloadlinux-b792ffe464f64c84c48d51e01c0fecabc4b39579.tar.xz
linux-b792ffe464f64c84c48d51e01c0fecabc4b39579.zip
Docs: SubmittingPatches: mention using pull requests as a cover letter
Suggested-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
-rw-r--r--Documentation/SubmittingPatches4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 1f4e8c8710a7..40b619ef9b6a 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -725,7 +725,9 @@ maintainer pull them directly into the subsystem repository with a
"git pull" operation. Note, however, that pulling patches from a developer
requires a higher degree of trust than taking patches from a mailing list.
As a result, many subsystem maintainers are reluctant to take pull
-requests, especially from new, unknown developers.
+requests, especially from new, unknown developers. If in doubt you can use
+the pull request as the cover letter for a normal posting of the patch
+series, giving the maintainer the option of using either.
A pull request should have [GIT] or [PULL] in the subject line. The
request itself should include the repository name and the branch of