summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>2015-10-02 00:36:57 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2015-10-02 03:42:35 +0200
commit2f84a8990ebbe235c59716896e017c6b2ca1200f (patch)
tree556282bc5eab5c75394236f796d5120d48718f99
parentmm/slab: fix unexpected index mapping result of kmalloc_size(INDEX_NODE+1) (diff)
downloadlinux-2f84a8990ebbe235c59716896e017c6b2ca1200f.tar.xz
linux-2f84a8990ebbe235c59716896e017c6b2ca1200f.zip
mm: hugetlbfs: skip shared VMAs when unmapping private pages to satisfy a fault
SunDong reported the following on https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103841 I think I find a linux bug, I have the test cases is constructed. I can stable recurring problems in fedora22(4.0.4) kernel version, arch for x86_64. I construct transparent huge page, when the parent and child process with MAP_SHARE, MAP_PRIVATE way to access the same huge page area, it has the opportunity to lead to huge page copy on write failure, and then it will munmap the child corresponding mmap area, but then the child mmap area with VM_MAYSHARE attributes, child process munmap this area can trigger VM_BUG_ON in set_vma_resv_flags functions (vma - > vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE). There were a number of problems with the report (e.g. it's hugetlbfs that triggers this, not transparent huge pages) but it was fundamentally correct in that a VM_BUG_ON in set_vma_resv_flags() can be triggered that looks like this vma ffff8804651fd0d0 start 00007fc474e00000 end 00007fc475e00000 next ffff8804651fd018 prev ffff8804651fd188 mm ffff88046b1b1800 prot 8000000000000027 anon_vma (null) vm_ops ffffffff8182a7a0 pgoff 0 file ffff88106bdb9800 private_data (null) flags: 0x84400fb(read|write|shared|mayread|maywrite|mayexec|mayshare|dontexpand|hugetlb) ------------ kernel BUG at mm/hugetlb.c:462! SMP Modules linked in: xt_pkttype xt_LOG xt_limit [..] CPU: 38 PID: 26839 Comm: map Not tainted 4.0.4-default #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R810/0TT6JF, BIOS 2.7.4 04/26/2012 set_vma_resv_flags+0x2d/0x30 The VM_BUG_ON is correct because private and shared mappings have different reservation accounting but the warning clearly shows that the VMA is shared. When a private COW fails to allocate a new page then only the process that created the VMA gets the page -- all the children unmap the page. If the children access that data in the future then they get killed. The problem is that the same file is mapped shared and private. During the COW, the allocation fails, the VMAs are traversed to unmap the other private pages but a shared VMA is found and the bug is triggered. This patch identifies such VMAs and skips them. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Reported-by: SunDong <sund_sky@126.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/hugetlb.c8
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index 999fb0aef8f1..9cc773483624 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3202,6 +3202,14 @@ static void unmap_ref_private(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
continue;
/*
+ * Shared VMAs have their own reserves and do not affect
+ * MAP_PRIVATE accounting but it is possible that a shared
+ * VMA is using the same page so check and skip such VMAs.
+ */
+ if (iter_vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
* Unmap the page from other VMAs without their own reserves.
* They get marked to be SIGKILLed if they fault in these
* areas. This is because a future no-page fault on this VMA