diff options
author | Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> | 2017-12-04 11:23:22 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-01-10 12:53:34 +0100 |
commit | 0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac (patch) | |
tree | 43fdc6fdefff64dd8d20ba3364ec82511f4b5e8a | |
parent | sched/cpufreq: Split utilization signals (diff) | |
download | linux-0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac.tar.xz linux-0fa7d181f1a60149061632266bb432b4b61acdac.zip |
sched/cpufreq: Always consider all CPUs when deciding next freq
No assumption can be made upon the rate at which frequency updates get
triggered, as there are scheduling policies (like SCHED_DEADLINE) which
don't trigger them so frequently.
Remove such assumption from the code, by always considering
SCHED_DEADLINE utilization signal as not stale.
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: alessio.balsini@arm.com
Cc: bristot@redhat.com
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Cc: joelaf@google.com
Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Cc: morten.rasmussen@arm.com
Cc: patrick.bellasi@arm.com
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: tkjos@android.com
Cc: tommaso.cucinotta@santannapisa.it
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171204102325.5110-6-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c index e9e0713f85f3..dd062a1c8cf0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c @@ -315,17 +315,21 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time) s64 delta_ns; /* - * If the CPU utilization was last updated before the previous - * frequency update and the time elapsed between the last update - * of the CPU utilization and the last frequency update is long - * enough, don't take the CPU into account as it probably is - * idle now (and clear iowait_boost for it). + * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the + * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the + * last update of the CPU utilization and the last frequency + * update is long enough, reset iowait_boost and util_cfs, as + * they are now probably stale. However, still consider the + * CPU contribution if it has some DEADLINE utilization + * (util_dl). */ delta_ns = time - j_sg_cpu->last_update; if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) { j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0; j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false; - continue; + j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0; + if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0) + continue; } if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT) return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; |