summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-05-30 06:16:09 +0200
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2021-05-30 06:16:09 +0200
commit9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237 (patch)
tree28f2187b84c22f2388c05e568f6b5672d4a39f5a
parentMerge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke... (diff)
parentseccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics (diff)
downloadlinux-9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237.tar.xz
linux-9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237.zip
Merge tag 'seccomp-fixes-v5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull seccomp fixes from Kees Cook: "This fixes a hard-to-hit race condition in the addfd user_notif feature of seccomp, visible since v5.9. And a small documentation fix" * tag 'seccomp-fixes-v5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux: seccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics Documentation: seccomp: Fix user notification documentation
-rw-r--r--Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst16
-rw-r--r--kernel/seccomp.c30
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
index bd9165241b6c..6efb41cc8072 100644
--- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
+++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst
@@ -250,14 +250,14 @@ Users can read via ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV)`` (or ``poll()``) on a
seccomp notification fd to receive a ``struct seccomp_notif``, which contains
five members: the input length of the structure, a unique-per-filter ``id``,
the ``pid`` of the task which triggered this request (which may be 0 if the
-task is in a pid ns not visible from the listener's pid namespace), a ``flags``
-member which for now only has ``SECCOMP_NOTIF_FLAG_SIGNALED``, representing
-whether or not the notification is a result of a non-fatal signal, and the
-``data`` passed to seccomp. Userspace can then make a decision based on this
-information about what to do, and ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND)`` a
-response, indicating what should be returned to userspace. The ``id`` member of
-``struct seccomp_notif_resp`` should be the same ``id`` as in ``struct
-seccomp_notif``.
+task is in a pid ns not visible from the listener's pid namespace). The
+notification also contains the ``data`` passed to seccomp, and a filters flag.
+The structure should be zeroed out prior to calling the ioctl.
+
+Userspace can then make a decision based on this information about what to do,
+and ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND)`` a response, indicating what should be
+returned to userspace. The ``id`` member of ``struct seccomp_notif_resp`` should
+be the same ``id`` as in ``struct seccomp_notif``.
It is worth noting that ``struct seccomp_data`` contains the values of register
arguments to the syscall, but does not contain pointers to memory. The task's
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 6ecd3f3a52b5..9f58049ac16d 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -1105,28 +1105,30 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall,
up(&match->notif->request);
wake_up_poll(&match->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
/*
* This is where we wait for a reply from userspace.
*/
-wait:
- err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
- mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
- if (err == 0) {
- /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ do {
+ mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
+ err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready);
+ mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock);
+ if (err != 0)
+ goto interrupted;
+
addfd = list_first_entry_or_null(&n.addfd,
struct seccomp_kaddfd, list);
- if (addfd && n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED) {
+ /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */
+ if (addfd)
seccomp_handle_addfd(addfd);
- mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock);
- goto wait;
- }
- ret = n.val;
- err = n.error;
- flags = n.flags;
- }
+ } while (n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED);
+
+ ret = n.val;
+ err = n.error;
+ flags = n.flags;
+
+interrupted:
/* If there were any pending addfd calls, clear them out */
list_for_each_entry_safe(addfd, tmp, &n.addfd, list) {
/* The process went away before we got a chance to handle it */