diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-05-30 06:16:09 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2021-05-30 06:16:09 +0200 |
commit | 9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237 (patch) | |
tree | 28f2187b84c22f2388c05e568f6b5672d4a39f5a | |
parent | Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke... (diff) | |
parent | seccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics (diff) | |
download | linux-9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237.tar.xz linux-9a76c0ee3a759c1aaeedaaac9d3831397f264237.zip |
Merge tag 'seccomp-fixes-v5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull seccomp fixes from Kees Cook:
"This fixes a hard-to-hit race condition in the addfd user_notif
feature of seccomp, visible since v5.9.
And a small documentation fix"
* tag 'seccomp-fixes-v5.13-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
seccomp: Refactor notification handler to prepare for new semantics
Documentation: seccomp: Fix user notification documentation
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/seccomp.c | 30 |
2 files changed, 24 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst index bd9165241b6c..6efb41cc8072 100644 --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/seccomp_filter.rst @@ -250,14 +250,14 @@ Users can read via ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_RECV)`` (or ``poll()``) on a seccomp notification fd to receive a ``struct seccomp_notif``, which contains five members: the input length of the structure, a unique-per-filter ``id``, the ``pid`` of the task which triggered this request (which may be 0 if the -task is in a pid ns not visible from the listener's pid namespace), a ``flags`` -member which for now only has ``SECCOMP_NOTIF_FLAG_SIGNALED``, representing -whether or not the notification is a result of a non-fatal signal, and the -``data`` passed to seccomp. Userspace can then make a decision based on this -information about what to do, and ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND)`` a -response, indicating what should be returned to userspace. The ``id`` member of -``struct seccomp_notif_resp`` should be the same ``id`` as in ``struct -seccomp_notif``. +task is in a pid ns not visible from the listener's pid namespace). The +notification also contains the ``data`` passed to seccomp, and a filters flag. +The structure should be zeroed out prior to calling the ioctl. + +Userspace can then make a decision based on this information about what to do, +and ``ioctl(SECCOMP_IOCTL_NOTIF_SEND)`` a response, indicating what should be +returned to userspace. The ``id`` member of ``struct seccomp_notif_resp`` should +be the same ``id`` as in ``struct seccomp_notif``. It is worth noting that ``struct seccomp_data`` contains the values of register arguments to the syscall, but does not contain pointers to memory. The task's diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c index 6ecd3f3a52b5..9f58049ac16d 100644 --- a/kernel/seccomp.c +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c @@ -1105,28 +1105,30 @@ static int seccomp_do_user_notification(int this_syscall, up(&match->notif->request); wake_up_poll(&match->wqh, EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM); - mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock); /* * This is where we wait for a reply from userspace. */ -wait: - err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready); - mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock); - if (err == 0) { - /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */ + do { + mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock); + err = wait_for_completion_interruptible(&n.ready); + mutex_lock(&match->notify_lock); + if (err != 0) + goto interrupted; + addfd = list_first_entry_or_null(&n.addfd, struct seccomp_kaddfd, list); - if (addfd && n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED) { + /* Check if we were woken up by a addfd message */ + if (addfd) seccomp_handle_addfd(addfd); - mutex_unlock(&match->notify_lock); - goto wait; - } - ret = n.val; - err = n.error; - flags = n.flags; - } + } while (n.state != SECCOMP_NOTIFY_REPLIED); + + ret = n.val; + err = n.error; + flags = n.flags; + +interrupted: /* If there were any pending addfd calls, clear them out */ list_for_each_entry_safe(addfd, tmp, &n.addfd, list) { /* The process went away before we got a chance to handle it */ |