summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSrivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2013-07-01 00:40:55 +0200
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2013-07-01 00:40:55 +0200
commitf51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd (patch)
tree9727fe247814aea091dd2579589341cd46a08bab
parentcpufreq: don't leave stale policy pointer in cdbs->cur_policy (diff)
downloadlinux-f51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd.tar.xz
linux-f51e1eb63d9c28cec188337ee656a13be6980cfd.zip
cpufreq: Fix cpufreq regression after suspend/resume
Toralf Förster reported that the cpufreq ondemand governor behaves erratically (doesn't scale well) after a suspend/resume cycle. The problem was that the cpufreq subsystem's idea of the cpu frequencies differed from the actual frequencies set in the hardware after a suspend/resume cycle. Toralf bisected the problem to commit a66b2e5 (cpufreq: Preserve sysfs files across suspend/resume). Among other (harmless) things, that commit skipped the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path. But cpufreq_update_policy() plays an important role during resume, because it is responsible for checking if the BIOS changed the cpu frequencies behind our back and resynchronize the cpufreq subsystem's knowledge of the cpu frequencies, and update them accordingly. So, restore the call to cpufreq_update_policy() in the resume path to fix the cpufreq regression. Reported-and-tested-by: Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: 3.10+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
index 6d35caa91167..cd9e81713a71 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ static int __cpuinit cpufreq_stat_cpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action) {
case CPU_ONLINE:
+ case CPU_ONLINE_FROZEN:
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
break;
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE: