diff options
| author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2016-08-02 23:03:44 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2016-08-03 01:35:02 +0200 |
| commit | 61e96496d3c949701a48b908f99f4ed891cd1101 (patch) | |
| tree | bf282d3036968de0bfd834914d712b6875fff7e3 | |
| parent | include: mman: use bool instead of int for the return value of arch_validate_... (diff) | |
| download | linux-61e96496d3c949701a48b908f99f4ed891cd1101.tar.xz linux-61e96496d3c949701a48b908f99f4ed891cd1101.zip | |
task_work: use READ_ONCE/lockless_dereference, avoid pi_lock if !task_works
Change task_work_cancel() to use lockless_dereference(), this is what
the code really wants but we didn't have this helper when it was
written.
Also add the fast-path task->task_works == NULL check, in the likely
case this task has no pending works and we can avoid
spin_lock(task->pi_lock).
While at it, change other users of ACCESS_ONCE() to use READ_ONCE().
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160610150042.GA13868@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/task_work.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/task_work.c b/kernel/task_work.c index 6ab4842b00e8..d513051fcca2 100644 --- a/kernel/task_work.c +++ b/kernel/task_work.c @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ task_work_add(struct task_struct *task, struct callback_head *work, bool notify) struct callback_head *head; do { - head = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works); + head = READ_ONCE(task->task_works); if (unlikely(head == &work_exited)) return -ESRCH; work->next = head; @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func) struct callback_head **pprev = &task->task_works; struct callback_head *work; unsigned long flags; + + if (likely(!task->task_works)) + return NULL; /* * If cmpxchg() fails we continue without updating pprev. * Either we raced with task_work_add() which added the @@ -64,8 +67,7 @@ task_work_cancel(struct task_struct *task, task_work_func_t func) * we raced with task_work_run(), *pprev == NULL/exited. */ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags); - while ((work = ACCESS_ONCE(*pprev))) { - smp_read_barrier_depends(); + while ((work = lockless_dereference(*pprev))) { if (work->func != func) pprev = &work->next; else if (cmpxchg(pprev, work, work->next) == work) @@ -95,7 +97,7 @@ void task_work_run(void) * work_exited unless the list is empty. */ do { - work = ACCESS_ONCE(task->task_works); + work = READ_ONCE(task->task_works); head = !work && (task->flags & PF_EXITING) ? &work_exited : NULL; } while (cmpxchg(&task->task_works, work, head) != work); |