diff options
author | Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> | 2022-09-06 17:13:00 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2022-09-07 20:04:27 +0200 |
commit | fb66223a244f252273995557b23e0fa53092e92c (patch) | |
tree | dcf688c426b2db8ce56f2b755be5f0e7c50b2d38 | |
parent | bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context (diff) | |
download | linux-fb66223a244f252273995557b23e0fa53092e92c.tar.xz linux-fb66223a244f252273995557b23e0fa53092e92c.zip |
selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type
We need to also export the kfunc set to the syscall program type,
and then add a couple of eBPF programs that are testing those calls.
The first one checks for valid access, and the second one is OK
from a static analysis point of view but fails at run time because
we are trying to access outside of the allocated memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220906151303.2780789-5-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | net/bpf/test_run.c | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 143 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c | 39 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 38 |
4 files changed, 214 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index 25d8ecf105aa..f16baf977a21 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -1634,6 +1634,7 @@ static int __init bpf_prog_test_run_init(void) ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set); ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set); + ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set); return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc, ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc), THIS_MODULE); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c index 9dfbe5355a2d..d5881c3331a8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ /* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */ #include <test_progs.h> #include <network_helpers.h> +#include "kfunc_call_fail.skel.h" #include "kfunc_call_test.skel.h" #include "kfunc_call_test.lskel.h" #include "kfunc_call_test_subprog.skel.h" @@ -10,37 +11,96 @@ #include "cap_helpers.h" +static size_t log_buf_sz = 1048576; /* 1 MB */ +static char obj_log_buf[1048576]; + +enum kfunc_test_type { + tc_test = 0, + syscall_test, + syscall_null_ctx_test, +}; + struct kfunc_test_params { const char *prog_name; unsigned long lskel_prog_desc_offset; int retval; + enum kfunc_test_type test_type; + const char *expected_err_msg; }; -#define TC_TEST(name, __retval) \ +#define __BPF_TEST_SUCCESS(name, __retval, type) \ { \ .prog_name = #name, \ .lskel_prog_desc_offset = offsetof(struct kfunc_call_test_lskel, progs.name), \ .retval = __retval, \ + .test_type = type, \ + .expected_err_msg = NULL, \ + } + +#define __BPF_TEST_FAIL(name, __retval, type, error_msg) \ + { \ + .prog_name = #name, \ + .lskel_prog_desc_offset = 0 /* unused when test is failing */, \ + .retval = __retval, \ + .test_type = type, \ + .expected_err_msg = error_msg, \ } +#define TC_TEST(name, retval) __BPF_TEST_SUCCESS(name, retval, tc_test) +#define SYSCALL_TEST(name, retval) __BPF_TEST_SUCCESS(name, retval, syscall_test) +#define SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_TEST(name, retval) __BPF_TEST_SUCCESS(name, retval, syscall_null_ctx_test) + +#define SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_FAIL(name, retval, error_msg) \ + __BPF_TEST_FAIL(name, retval, syscall_null_ctx_test, error_msg) + static struct kfunc_test_params kfunc_tests[] = { + /* failure cases: + * if retval is 0 -> the program will fail to load and the error message is an error + * if retval is not 0 -> the program can be loaded but running it will gives the + * provided return value. The error message is thus the one + * from a successful load + */ + SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_FAIL(kfunc_syscall_test_fail, -EINVAL, "processed 4 insns"), + SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_FAIL(kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail, -EINVAL, "processed 4 insns"), + + /* success cases */ TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test1, 12), TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test2, 3), TC_TEST(kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id, 0), + SYSCALL_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test, 0), + SYSCALL_NULL_CTX_TEST(kfunc_syscall_test_null, 0), +}; + +struct syscall_test_args { + __u8 data[16]; + size_t size; }; static void verify_success(struct kfunc_test_params *param) { struct kfunc_call_test_lskel *lskel = NULL; + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); struct bpf_prog_desc *lskel_prog; struct kfunc_call_test *skel; struct bpf_program *prog; int prog_fd, err; - LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts, - .data_in = &pkt_v4, - .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4), - .repeat = 1, - ); + struct syscall_test_args args = { + .size = 10, + }; + + switch (param->test_type) { + case syscall_test: + topts.ctx_in = &args; + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args); + /* fallthrough */ + case syscall_null_ctx_test: + break; + case tc_test: + topts.data_in = &pkt_v4; + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4); + topts.repeat = 1; + break; + } /* first test with normal libbpf */ skel = kfunc_call_test__open_and_load(); @@ -79,6 +139,72 @@ cleanup: kfunc_call_test_lskel__destroy(lskel); } +static void verify_fail(struct kfunc_test_params *param) +{ + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts); + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); + struct bpf_program *prog; + struct kfunc_call_fail *skel; + int prog_fd, err; + struct syscall_test_args args = { + .size = 10, + }; + + opts.kernel_log_buf = obj_log_buf; + opts.kernel_log_size = log_buf_sz; + opts.kernel_log_level = 1; + + switch (param->test_type) { + case syscall_test: + topts.ctx_in = &args; + topts.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args); + /* fallthrough */ + case syscall_null_ctx_test: + break; + case tc_test: + topts.data_in = &pkt_v4; + topts.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4); + break; + topts.repeat = 1; + } + + skel = kfunc_call_fail__open_opts(&opts); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kfunc_call_fail__open_opts")) + goto cleanup; + + prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, param->prog_name); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "bpf_object__find_program_by_name")) + goto cleanup; + + bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true); + + err = kfunc_call_fail__load(skel); + if (!param->retval) { + /* the verifier is supposed to complain and refuses to load */ + if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected load success")) + goto out_err; + + } else { + /* the program is loaded but must dynamically fail */ + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "unexpected load error")) + goto out_err; + + prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog); + err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); + if (!ASSERT_EQ(err, param->retval, param->prog_name)) + goto out_err; + } + +out_err: + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, param->expected_err_msg), "expected_err_msg")) { + fprintf(stderr, "Expected err_msg: %s\n", param->expected_err_msg); + fprintf(stderr, "Verifier output: %s\n", obj_log_buf); + } + +cleanup: + kfunc_call_fail__destroy(skel); +} + static void test_main(void) { int i; @@ -87,7 +213,10 @@ static void test_main(void) if (!test__start_subtest(kfunc_tests[i].prog_name)) continue; - verify_success(&kfunc_tests[i]); + if (!kfunc_tests[i].expected_err_msg) + verify_success(&kfunc_tests[i]); + else + verify_fail(&kfunc_tests[i]); } } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..4168027f2ab1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */ +#include <vmlinux.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> + +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(void *mem, int len) __ksym; + +struct syscall_test_args { + __u8 data[16]; + size_t size; +}; + +SEC("?syscall") +int kfunc_syscall_test_fail(struct syscall_test_args *args) +{ + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args) + 1); + + return 0; +} + +SEC("?syscall") +int kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail(struct syscall_test_args *args) +{ + /* Must be called with args as a NULL pointer + * we do not check for it to have the verifier consider that + * the pointer might not be null, and so we can load it. + * + * So the following can not be added: + * + * if (args) + * return -22; + */ + + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(args, sizeof(*args)); + + return 0; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c index 5aecbb9fdc68..9e1914916f1d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c @@ -92,4 +92,42 @@ int kfunc_call_test_pass(struct __sk_buff *skb) return 0; } +struct syscall_test_args { + __u8 data[16]; + size_t size; +}; + +SEC("syscall") +int kfunc_syscall_test(struct syscall_test_args *args) +{ + const long size = args->size; + + if (size > sizeof(args->data)) + return -7; /* -E2BIG */ + + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(args->data)); + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args)); + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, size); + + return 0; +} + +SEC("syscall") +int kfunc_syscall_test_null(struct syscall_test_args *args) +{ + /* Must be called with args as a NULL pointer + * we do not check for it to have the verifier consider that + * the pointer might not be null, and so we can load it. + * + * So the following can not be added: + * + * if (args) + * return -22; + */ + + bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(args, 0); + + return 0; +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; |