summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>2022-04-21 01:12:30 +0200
committerMaxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>2022-04-21 09:18:08 +0200
commitb089c0a9b14c354a0c3a421e09af3208cb7c232c (patch)
treefe2473bcdd22788a7a12cc5d6621c328ad39a0ca
parentRevert "drm: of: Properly try all possible cases for bridge/panel detection" (diff)
downloadlinux-b089c0a9b14c354a0c3a421e09af3208cb7c232c.tar.xz
linux-b089c0a9b14c354a0c3a421e09af3208cb7c232c.zip
Revert "drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or bridge"
Commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or bridge")' attempted to simplify the case of expressing a simple panel under a DSI controller, by assuming that the first non-graph child node was a panel or bridge. Unfortunately for non-trivial cases the first child node might not be a panel or bridge. Examples of this can be a aux-bus in the case of DisplayPort, or an opp-table represented before the panel node. In these cases the reverted commit prevents the caller from ever finding a reference to the panel. This reverts commit '80253168dbfd ("drm: of: Lookup if child node has panel or bridge")', in favor of using an explicit graph reference to the panel in the trivial case as well. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220420231230.58499-2-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c17
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
index 026e4e29a0f3..9a2cfab3a177 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
@@ -244,21 +244,6 @@ int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
if (panel)
*panel = NULL;
- /**
- * Devices can also be child nodes when we also control that device
- * through the upstream device (ie, MIPI-DCS for a MIPI-DSI device).
- *
- * Lookup for a child node of the given parent that isn't either port
- * or ports.
- */
- for_each_available_child_of_node(np, remote) {
- if (of_node_name_eq(remote, "port") ||
- of_node_name_eq(remote, "ports"))
- continue;
-
- goto of_find_panel_or_bridge;
- }
-
/*
* of_graph_get_remote_node() produces a noisy error message if port
* node isn't found and the absence of the port is a legit case here,
@@ -269,8 +254,6 @@ int drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(const struct device_node *np,
return -ENODEV;
remote = of_graph_get_remote_node(np, port, endpoint);
-
-of_find_panel_or_bridge:
if (!remote)
return -ENODEV;