summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorluca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>2019-03-25 14:15:30 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2019-04-16 16:54:58 +0200
commit1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f (patch)
tree1dfd4308ddb2928cd277a314e6c281766a1cd6c5
parentsched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup (diff)
downloadlinux-1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f.tar.xz
linux-1b02cd6a2d7f3e2a6a5262887d2cb2912083e42f.zip
sched/deadline: Correctly handle active 0-lag timers
syzbot reported the following warning: [ ] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 17089 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:255 task_non_contending+0xae0/0x1950 line 255 of deadline.c is: WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)); in task_non_contending(). Unfortunately, in some cases (for example, a deadline task continuosly blocking and waking immediately) it can happen that a task blocks (and task_non_contending() is called) while the 0-lag timer is still active. In this case, the safest thing to do is to immediately decrease the running bandwidth of the task, without trying to re-arm the 0-lag timer. Signed-off-by: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: chengjian (D) <cj.chengjian@huawei.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190325131530.34706-1-luca.abeni@santannapisa.it Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/deadline.c3
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 6a73e41a2016..43901fa3f269 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -252,7 +252,6 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p)
if (dl_entity_is_special(dl_se))
return;
- WARN_ON(hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer));
WARN_ON(dl_se->dl_non_contending);
zerolag_time = dl_se->deadline -
@@ -269,7 +268,7 @@ static void task_non_contending(struct task_struct *p)
* If the "0-lag time" already passed, decrease the active
* utilization now, instead of starting a timer
*/
- if (zerolag_time < 0) {
+ if ((zerolag_time < 0) || hrtimer_active(&dl_se->inactive_timer)) {
if (dl_task(p))
sub_running_bw(dl_se, dl_rq);
if (!dl_task(p) || p->state == TASK_DEAD) {