diff options
author | Erik Kurzinger <ekurzinger@nvidia.com> | 2024-01-19 17:32:06 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr> | 2024-02-22 13:19:53 +0100 |
commit | 3c43177ffb54ea5be97505eb8e2690e99ac96bc9 (patch) | |
tree | 1072fb6ec35f92ad419047a9236c44faf1be2a06 | |
parent | drm/ttm: Fix an invalid freeing on already freed page in error path (diff) | |
download | linux-3c43177ffb54ea5be97505eb8e2690e99ac96bc9.tar.xz linux-3c43177ffb54ea5be97505eb8e2690e99ac96bc9.zip |
drm/syncobj: call drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait when WAIT_AVAILABLE flag is set
When waiting for a syncobj timeline point whose fence has not yet been
submitted with the WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT flag, a callback is registered using
drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait and the thread is put to sleep until the
timeout expires. If the fence is submitted before then,
drm_syncobj_add_point will wake up the sleeping thread immediately which
will proceed to wait for the fence to be signaled.
However, if the WAIT_AVAILABLE flag is used instead,
drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait won't get called, meaning the waiting thread
will always sleep for the full timeout duration, even if the fence gets
submitted earlier. If it turns out that the fence *has* been submitted
by the time it eventually wakes up, it will still indicate to userspace
that the wait completed successfully (it won't return -ETIME), but it
will have taken much longer than it should have.
To fix this, we must call drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait if *either* the
WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT flag or the WAIT_AVAILABLE flag is set. The only
difference being that with WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT we will also wait for the
fence to be signaled after it has been submitted while with
WAIT_AVAILABLE we will return immediately.
IGT test patch: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/igt-dev/2024-January/067537.html
v1 -> v2: adjust lockdep_assert_none_held_once condition
(cherry picked from commit 8c44ea81634a4a337df70a32621a5f3791be23df)
Fixes: 01d6c3578379 ("drm/syncobj: add support for timeline point wait v8")
Signed-off-by: Erik Kurzinger <ekurzinger@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Simon Ser <contact@emersion.fr>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240119163208.3723457-1-ekurzinger@nvidia.com
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c index 84101baeecc6..56b0677acfa3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c @@ -1040,7 +1040,8 @@ static signed long drm_syncobj_array_wait_timeout(struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs, uint64_t *points; uint32_t signaled_count, i; - if (flags & DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) + if (flags & (DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT | + DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_AVAILABLE)) lockdep_assert_none_held_once(); points = kmalloc_array(count, sizeof(*points), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -1109,7 +1110,8 @@ static signed long drm_syncobj_array_wait_timeout(struct drm_syncobj **syncobjs, * fallthough and try a 0 timeout wait! */ - if (flags & DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT) { + if (flags & (DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT | + DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_AVAILABLE)) { for (i = 0; i < count; ++i) drm_syncobj_fence_add_wait(syncobjs[i], &entries[i]); } |