diff options
author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2024-08-06 18:41:07 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2024-08-16 07:16:14 +0200 |
commit | d75abd0d0bc29e6ebfebbf76d11b4067b35844af (patch) | |
tree | 1e6d3c8e9840d77276cca30856dc49bb012c57b8 | |
parent | mm: don't account memmap per-node (diff) | |
download | linux-d75abd0d0bc29e6ebfebbf76d11b4067b35844af.tar.xz linux-d75abd0d0bc29e6ebfebbf76d11b4067b35844af.zip |
mm/memory-failure: use raw_spinlock_t in struct memory_failure_cpu
The memory_failure_cpu structure is a per-cpu structure. Access to its
content requires the use of get_cpu_var() to lock in the current CPU and
disable preemption. The use of a regular spinlock_t for locking purpose
is fine for a non-RT kernel.
Since the integration of RT spinlock support into the v5.15 kernel, a
spinlock_t in a RT kernel becomes a sleeping lock and taking a sleeping
lock in a preemption disabled context is illegal resulting in the
following kind of warning.
[12135.732244] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
[12135.732248] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 270076, name: kworker/0:0
[12135.732252] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[12135.732255] RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 2
:
[12135.732420] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R640/0HG0J8, BIOS 2.10.2 02/24/2021
[12135.732423] Workqueue: kacpi_notify acpi_os_execute_deferred
[12135.732433] Call Trace:
[12135.732436] <TASK>
[12135.732450] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x81
[12135.732461] __might_resched.cold+0xf4/0x12f
[12135.732479] rt_spin_lock+0x4c/0x100
[12135.732491] memory_failure_queue+0x40/0xe0
[12135.732503] ghes_do_memory_failure+0x53/0x390
[12135.732516] ghes_do_proc.constprop.0+0x229/0x3e0
[12135.732575] ghes_proc+0xf9/0x1a0
[12135.732591] ghes_notify_hed+0x6a/0x150
[12135.732602] notifier_call_chain+0x43/0xb0
[12135.732626] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x43/0x60
[12135.732637] acpi_ev_notify_dispatch+0x47/0x70
[12135.732648] acpi_os_execute_deferred+0x13/0x20
[12135.732654] process_one_work+0x41f/0x500
[12135.732695] worker_thread+0x192/0x360
[12135.732715] kthread+0x111/0x140
[12135.732733] ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
[12135.732779] </TASK>
Fix it by using a raw_spinlock_t for locking instead.
Also move the pr_err() out of the lock critical section and after
put_cpu_ptr() to avoid indeterminate latency and the possibility of sleep
with this call.
[longman@redhat.com: don't hold percpu ref across pr_err(), per Miaohe]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240807181130.1122660-1-longman@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240806164107.1044956-1-longman@redhat.com
Fixes: 0f383b6dc96e ("locking/spinlock: Provide RT variant")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | mm/memory-failure.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c index 581d3e5c9117..7066fc84f351 100644 --- a/mm/memory-failure.c +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c @@ -2417,7 +2417,7 @@ struct memory_failure_entry { struct memory_failure_cpu { DECLARE_KFIFO(fifo, struct memory_failure_entry, MEMORY_FAILURE_FIFO_SIZE); - spinlock_t lock; + raw_spinlock_t lock; struct work_struct work; }; @@ -2443,20 +2443,22 @@ void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int flags) { struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu; unsigned long proc_flags; + bool buffer_overflow; struct memory_failure_entry entry = { .pfn = pfn, .flags = flags, }; mf_cpu = &get_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu); - spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); - if (kfifo_put(&mf_cpu->fifo, entry)) + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); + buffer_overflow = !kfifo_put(&mf_cpu->fifo, entry); + if (!buffer_overflow) schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &mf_cpu->work); - else + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); + put_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu); + if (buffer_overflow) pr_err("buffer overflow when queuing memory failure at %#lx\n", pfn); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); - put_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_failure_queue); @@ -2469,9 +2471,9 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work) mf_cpu = container_of(work, struct memory_failure_cpu, work); for (;;) { - spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); gotten = kfifo_get(&mf_cpu->fifo, &entry); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags); if (!gotten) break; if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE) @@ -2501,7 +2503,7 @@ static int __init memory_failure_init(void) for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu); - spin_lock_init(&mf_cpu->lock); + raw_spin_lock_init(&mf_cpu->lock); INIT_KFIFO(mf_cpu->fifo); INIT_WORK(&mf_cpu->work, memory_failure_work_func); } |