diff options
author | Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> | 2011-08-25 21:42:20 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com> | 2011-08-29 22:00:01 +0200 |
commit | 9029bd7a42e3c32783866630ee3eb6b82e273544 (patch) | |
tree | c01d9d79845140b39cb15153c065f19682fd6690 /CREDITS | |
parent | DocBook/drm: Use a singular subject for grammatical cleanliness (diff) | |
download | linux-9029bd7a42e3c32783866630ee3eb6b82e273544.tar.xz linux-9029bd7a42e3c32783866630ee3eb6b82e273544.zip |
DocBook/drm: The word `so-called'; I do not think it connotes what you think it connotes
From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:
So-called \So"-called`\, a.
So named; called by such a name (but perhaps called thus with
doubtful propriety).
From WordNet (r) 2.0 [wn]:
so-called
adj : doubtful or suspect; "these so-called experts are no help"
[syn: {alleged(a)}, {supposed}]
My strong conviction is that widespread use of 'so gennant'
or 'sogennant' in German has led to the creeping misuse of
'so-called' in English (especially through technical writings).
In English, it would be better to use:
what is called
or a better translation of 'so gennant':
so named
Signed-off-by: Michael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'CREDITS')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions