Merge branch 'linus' into idle-test

1 files changed, 128 insertions, 16 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index a851118775d8..6a8c73f55b80 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -1,18 +1,22 @@
 CONFIG_RCU_TRACE debugfs Files and Formats
 
 
-The rcutree implementation of RCU provides debugfs trace output that
-summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for debugging
-RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU.
-The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats.
+The rcutree and rcutiny implementations of RCU provide debugfs trace
+output that summarizes counters and state.  This information is useful for
+debugging RCU itself, and can sometimes also help to debug abuses of RCU.
+The following sections describe the debugfs files and formats, first
+for rcutree and next for rcutiny.
 
 
-Hierarchical RCU debugfs Files and Formats
+CONFIG_TREE_RCU and CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats
 
-This implementation of RCU provides three debugfs files under the
+These implementations of RCU provides five debugfs files under the
 top-level directory RCU: rcu/rcudata (which displays fields in struct
-rcu_data), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters), and
-rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy).
+rcu_data), rcu/rcudata.csv (which is a .csv spreadsheet version of
+rcu/rcudata), rcu/rcugp (which displays grace-period counters),
+rcu/rcuhier (which displays the struct rcu_node hierarchy), and
+rcu/rcu_pending (which displays counts of the reasons that the
+rcu_pending() function decided that there was core RCU work to do).
 
 The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows:
 
@@ -130,7 +134,8 @@ o	"ci" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been invoked for
 	been registered in absence of CPU-hotplug activity.
 
 o	"co" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been orphaned due to
-	this CPU going offline.
+	this CPU going offline.  These orphaned callbacks have been moved
+	to an arbitrarily chosen online CPU.
 
 o	"ca" is the number of RCU callbacks that have been adopted due to
 	other CPUs going offline.  Note that ci+co-ca+ql is the number of
@@ -168,12 +173,12 @@ o	"gpnum" is the number of grace periods that have started.  It is
 
 The output of "cat rcu/rcuhier" looks as follows, with very long lines:
 
-c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6 oqlen=0
+c=6902 g=6903 s=2 jfq=3 j=72c7 nfqs=13142/nfqsng=0(13142) fqlh=6
 1/1 .>. 0:127 ^0    
 3/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3    
 3/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    2/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3    
 rcu_bh:
-c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0 oqlen=0
+c=-226 g=-226 s=1 jfq=-5701 j=72c7 nfqs=88/nfqsng=0(88) fqlh=0
 0/1 .>. 0:127 ^0    
 0/3 .>. 0:35 ^0    0/0 .>. 36:71 ^1    0/0 .>. 72:107 ^2    0/0 .>. 108:127 ^3    
 0/3f .>. 0:5 ^0    0/3 .>. 6:11 ^1    0/0 .>. 12:17 ^2    0/0 .>. 18:23 ^3    0/0 .>. 24:29 ^4    0/0 .>. 30:35 ^5    0/0 .>. 36:41 ^0    0/0 .>. 42:47 ^1    0/0 .>. 48:53 ^2    0/0 .>. 54:59 ^3    0/0 .>. 60:65 ^4    0/0 .>. 66:71 ^5    0/0 .>. 72:77 ^0    0/0 .>. 78:83 ^1    0/0 .>. 84:89 ^2    0/0 .>. 90:95 ^3    0/0 .>. 96:101 ^4    0/0 .>. 102:107 ^5    0/0 .>. 108:113 ^0    0/0 .>. 114:119 ^1    0/0 .>. 120:125 ^2    0/0 .>. 126:127 ^3
@@ -212,11 +217,6 @@ o	"fqlh" is the number of calls to force_quiescent_state() that
 	exited immediately (without even being counted in nfqs above)
 	due to contention on ->fqslock.
 
-o	"oqlen" is the number of callbacks on the "orphan" callback
-	list.  RCU callbacks are placed on this list by CPUs going
-	offline, and are "adopted" either by the CPU helping the outgoing
-	CPU or by the next rcu_barrier*() call, whichever comes first.
-
 o	Each element of the form "1/1 0:127 ^0" represents one struct
 	rcu_node.  Each line represents one level of the hierarchy, from
 	root to leaves.  It is best to think of the rcu_data structures
@@ -326,3 +326,115 @@ o	"nn" is the number of times that this CPU needed nothing.  Alert
 	readers will note that the rcu "nn" number for a given CPU very
 	closely matches the rcu_bh "np" number for that same CPU.  This
 	is due to short-circuit evaluation in rcu_pending().
+
+
+CONFIG_TINY_RCU and CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU debugfs Files and Formats
+
+These implementations of RCU provides a single debugfs file under the
+top-level directory RCU, namely rcu/rcudata, which displays fields in
+rcu_bh_ctrlblk, rcu_sched_ctrlblk and, for CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU,
+rcu_preempt_ctrlblk.
+
+The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" is as follows:
+
+rcu_preempt: qlen=24 gp=1097669 g197/p197/c197 tasks=...
+             ttb=. btg=no ntb=184 neb=0 nnb=183 j=01f7 bt=0274
+             normal balk: nt=1097669 gt=0 bt=371 b=0 ny=25073378 nos=0
+             exp balk: bt=0 nos=0
+rcu_sched: qlen: 0
+rcu_bh: qlen: 0
+
+This is split into rcu_preempt, rcu_sched, and rcu_bh sections, with the
+rcu_preempt section appearing only in CONFIG_TINY_PREEMPT_RCU builds.
+The last three lines of the rcu_preempt section appear only in
+CONFIG_RCU_BOOST kernel builds.  The fields are as follows:
+
+o	"qlen" is the number of RCU callbacks currently waiting either
+	for an RCU grace period or waiting to be invoked.  This is the
+	only field present for rcu_sched and rcu_bh, due to the
+	short-circuiting of grace period in those two cases.
+
+o	"gp" is the number of grace periods that have completed.
+
+o	"g197/p197/c197" displays the grace-period state, with the
+	"g" number being the number of grace periods that have started
+	(mod 256), the "p" number being the number of grace periods
+	that the CPU has responded to (also mod 256), and the "c"
+	number being the number of grace periods that have completed
+	(once again mode 256).
+
+	Why have both "gp" and "g"?  Because the data flowing into
+	"gp" is only present in a CONFIG_RCU_TRACE kernel.
+
+o	"tasks" is a set of bits.  The first bit is "T" if there are
+	currently tasks that have recently blocked within an RCU
+	read-side critical section, the second bit is "N" if any of the
+	aforementioned tasks are blocking the current RCU grace period,
+	and the third bit is "E" if any of the aforementioned tasks are
+	blocking the current expedited grace period.  Each bit is "."
+	if the corresponding condition does not hold.
+
+o	"ttb" is a single bit.  It is "B" if any of the blocked tasks
+	need to be priority boosted and "." otherwise.
+
+o	"btg" indicates whether boosting has been carried out during
+	the current grace period, with "exp" indicating that boosting
+	is in progress for an expedited grace period, "no" indicating
+	that boosting has not yet started for a normal grace period,
+	"begun" indicating that boosting has bebug for a normal grace
+	period, and "done" indicating that boosting has completed for
+	a normal grace period.
+
+o	"ntb" is the total number of tasks subjected to RCU priority boosting
+	periods since boot.
+
+o	"neb" is the number of expedited grace periods that have had
+	to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot.
+
+o	"nnb" is the number of normal grace periods that have had
+	to resort to RCU priority boosting since boot.
+
+o	"j" is the low-order 12 bits of the jiffies counter in hexadecimal.
+
+o	"bt" is the low-order 12 bits of the value that the jiffies counter
+	will have at the next time that boosting is scheduled to begin.
+
+o	In the line beginning with "normal balk", the fields are as follows:
+
+	o	"nt" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost.
+		Note that the system will balk from boosting even if the
+		grace period is overdue when the currently running task
+		is looping within an RCU read-side critical section.
+		There is no point in boosting in this case, because
+		boosting a running task won't make it run any faster.
+
+	o	"gt" is the number of times that the system balked
+		from boosting because, although there were blocked tasks,
+		none of them were preventing the current grace period
+		from completing.
+
+	o	"bt" is the number of times that the system balked
+		from boosting because boosting was already in progress.
+
+	o	"b" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		boosting because boosting had already completed for
+		the grace period in question.
+
+	o	"ny" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		boosting because it was not yet time to start boosting
+		the grace period in question.
+
+	o	"nos" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified")
+		reasons.  This can actually happen due to races involving
+		increments of the jiffies counter.
+
+o	In the line beginning with "exp balk", the fields are as follows:
+
+	o	"bt" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		boosting because there were no blocked tasks to boost.
+
+	o	"nos" is the number of times that the system balked from
+		 boosting for inexplicable ("not otherwise specified")
+		 reasons.