diff options
| author | Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> | 2018-09-22 00:31:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> | 2018-11-09 06:44:41 +0100 |
| commit | 2d0350a8f0e6eb5494141c61c5c749b5155df33d (patch) | |
| tree | 18a46122a843ca3c86f50b33bf8bd23fa0c4e6b9 /Documentation/RCU | |
| parent | doc: Set down forward-progress requirements (diff) | |
| download | linux-2d0350a8f0e6eb5494141c61c5c749b5155df33d.tar.xz linux-2d0350a8f0e6eb5494141c61c5c749b5155df33d.zip | |
doc: Clarify RCU data-structure comment about rcu_tree fanout
RCU Data-Structures document describes a trick to test RCU with small
number of CPUs but with a taller tree. It wasn't immediately clear how
the document arrived at 16 CPUs which also requires setting the
FANOUT_LEAF to 2 instead of the default of 16. This commit therefore
provides the needed clarification.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: <kernel-team@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/RCU')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html | 8 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html index 1d2051c0c3fc..476b1ac38e4c 100644 --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Data-Structures/Data-Structures.html @@ -127,9 +127,11 @@ CPUs, RCU would configure the <tt>rcu_node</tt> tree as follows: </p><p>RCU currently permits up to a four-level tree, which on a 64-bit system accommodates up to 4,194,304 CPUs, though only a mere 524,288 CPUs for 32-bit systems. -On the other hand, you can set <tt>CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT</tt> to be -as small as 2 if you wish, which would permit only 16 CPUs, which -is useful for testing. +On the other hand, you can set both <tt>CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT</tt> and +<tt>CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF</tt> to be as small as 2, which would result +in a 16-CPU test using a 4-level tree. +This can be useful for testing large-system capabilities on small test +machines. </p><p>This multi-level combining tree allows us to get most of the performance and scalability |