diff options
| author | Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> | 2007-07-15 10:36:06 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com> | 2007-10-10 04:56:28 +0200 |
| commit | 9cab0217f3f35bd618363842576867badb72ca4b (patch) | |
| tree | 5731aa857c7b1648cbc6d72ddd1b48fc583d517e /Documentation/hwmon/f71805f | |
| parent | hwmon: (w83792d) Add individual alarm files (diff) | |
| download | linux-9cab0217f3f35bd618363842576867badb72ca4b.tar.xz linux-9cab0217f3f35bd618363842576867badb72ca4b.zip | |
hwmon: (f71805f) List the F71806F/FG as supported
The Fintek F71806F/FG is compatible with the F71872F/FG, so it is
already supported by the f71805f hardware monitoring driver. In fact,
both chips have the same chip ID, so the driver can't even
differentiate between them.
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
Signed-off-by: Mark M. Hoffman <mhoffman@lightlink.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/hwmon/f71805f')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/hwmon/f71805f | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/f71805f b/Documentation/hwmon/f71805f index 94e0d2cbd3d2..f0d55976740a 100644 --- a/Documentation/hwmon/f71805f +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/f71805f @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Supported chips: Prefix: 'f71805f' Addresses scanned: none, address read from Super I/O config space Datasheet: Available from the Fintek website + * Fintek F71806F/FG + Prefix: 'f71872f' + Addresses scanned: none, address read from Super I/O config space + Datasheet: Available from the Fintek website * Fintek F71872F/FG Prefix: 'f71872f' Addresses scanned: none, address read from Super I/O config space @@ -38,6 +42,9 @@ The Fintek F71872F/FG Super I/O chip is almost the same, with two additional internal voltages monitored (VSB and battery). It also features 6 VID inputs. The VID inputs are not yet supported by this driver. +The Fintek F71806F/FG Super-I/O chip is essentially the same as the +F71872F/FG, and is undistinguishable therefrom. + The driver assumes that no more than one chip is present, which seems reasonable. |