summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/security
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <kees@outflux.net>2011-11-02 01:20:01 +0100
committerJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>2011-11-16 02:37:27 +0100
commite163bc8e4a0cd1cdffadb58253f7651201722d56 (patch)
tree66570af9c0304cf53350e8e67c67e407e92ee12f /Documentation/security
parentinclude/linux/security.h: fix security_inode_init_security() arg (diff)
downloadlinux-e163bc8e4a0cd1cdffadb58253f7651201722d56.tar.xz
linux-e163bc8e4a0cd1cdffadb58253f7651201722d56.zip
Documentation: clarify the purpose of LSMs
Clarify the purpose of the LSM interface with some brief examples and pointers to additional documentation. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/security')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/security/00-INDEX2
-rw-r--r--Documentation/security/LSM.txt34
-rw-r--r--Documentation/security/credentials.txt6
3 files changed, 39 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/security/00-INDEX b/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
index 19bc49439cac..99b85d39751c 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
+++ b/Documentation/security/00-INDEX
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
00-INDEX
- this file.
+LSM.txt
+ - description of the Linux Security Module framework.
SELinux.txt
- how to get started with the SELinux security enhancement.
Smack.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/security/LSM.txt b/Documentation/security/LSM.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c335a763a2ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/security/LSM.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+Linux Security Module framework
+-------------------------------
+
+The Linux Security Module (LSM) framework provides a mechanism for
+various security checks to be hooked by new kernel extensions. The name
+"module" is a bit of a misnomer since these extensions are not actually
+loadable kernel modules. Instead, they are selectable at build-time via
+CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY and can be overridden at boot-time via the
+"security=..." kernel command line argument, in the case where multiple
+LSMs were built into a given kernel.
+
+The primary users of the LSM interface are Mandatory Access Control
+(MAC) extensions which provide a comprehensive security policy. Examples
+include SELinux, Smack, Tomoyo, and AppArmor. In addition to the larger
+MAC extensions, other extensions can be built using the LSM to provide
+specific changes to system operation when these tweaks are not available
+in the core functionality of Linux itself.
+
+Without a specific LSM built into the kernel, the default LSM will be the
+Linux capabilities system. Most LSMs choose to extend the capabilities
+system, building their checks on top of the defined capability hooks.
+For more details on capabilities, see capabilities(7) in the Linux
+man-pages project.
+
+Based on http://kerneltrap.org/Linux/Documenting_Security_Module_Intent,
+a new LSM is accepted into the kernel when its intent (a description of
+what it tries to protect against and in what cases one would expect to
+use it) has been appropriately documented in Documentation/security/.
+This allows an LSM's code to be easily compared to its goals, and so
+that end users and distros can make a more informed decision about which
+LSMs suit their requirements.
+
+For extensive documentation on the available LSM hook interfaces, please
+see include/linux/security.h.
diff --git a/Documentation/security/credentials.txt b/Documentation/security/credentials.txt
index fc0366cbd7ce..86257052e31a 100644
--- a/Documentation/security/credentials.txt
+++ b/Documentation/security/credentials.txt
@@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ The Linux kernel supports the following types of credentials:
(5) LSM
The Linux Security Module allows extra controls to be placed over the
- operations that a task may do. Currently Linux supports two main
- alternate LSM options: SELinux and Smack.
+ operations that a task may do. Currently Linux supports several LSM
+ options.
- Both work by labelling the objects in a system and then applying sets of
+ Some work by labelling the objects in a system and then applying sets of
rules (policies) that say what operations a task with one label may do to
an object with another label.