diff options
| author | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> | 2013-10-08 19:38:13 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> | 2013-10-18 00:26:50 +0200 |
| commit | 58d5ec8f8ee318b26b29207874fbaee626973952 (patch) | |
| tree | bf3fdfd27af3c947c51fa4335009a45433a629f2 /arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | |
| parent | Merge tag 'kvm-arm-for-3.13-1' of git://git.linaro.org/people/cdall/linux-kvm... (diff) | |
| download | linux-58d5ec8f8ee318b26b29207874fbaee626973952.tar.xz linux-58d5ec8f8ee318b26b29207874fbaee626973952.zip | |
ARM: KVM: Yield CPU when vcpu executes a WFE
On an (even slightly) oversubscribed system, spinlocks are quickly
becoming a bottleneck, as some vcpus are spinning, waiting for a
lock to be released, while the vcpu holding the lock may not be
running at all.
This creates contention, and the observed slowdown is 40x for
hackbench. No, this isn't a typo.
The solution is to trap blocking WFEs and tell KVM that we're
now spinning. This ensures that other vpus will get a scheduling
boost, allowing the lock to be released more quickly. Also, using
CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT slightly improves the performance
when the VM is severely overcommited.
Quick test to estimate the performance: hackbench 1 process 1000
2xA15 host (baseline): 1.843s
2xA15 guest w/o patch: 2.083s
4xA15 guest w/o patch: 80.212s
8xA15 guest w/o patch: Could not be bothered to find out
2xA15 guest w/ patch: 2.102s
4xA15 guest w/ patch: 3.205s
8xA15 guest w/ patch: 6.887s
So we go from a 40x degradation to 1.5x in the 2x overcommit case,
which is vaguely more acceptable.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c index df4c82d47ad7..c4c496f7619c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -84,7 +84,11 @@ static int handle_dabt_hyp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int kvm_handle_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { trace_kvm_wfi(*vcpu_pc(vcpu)); - kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu); + if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & HSR_WFI_IS_WFE) + kvm_vcpu_on_spin(vcpu); + else + kvm_vcpu_block(vcpu); + return 1; } |