diff options
author | Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> | 2018-12-13 15:02:48 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> | 2019-02-01 23:05:23 +0100 |
commit | 6213f70e7c10fd4a01b65bad3826648fc78df8a8 (patch) | |
tree | c1296d53776c9668057f570485285754c2424ab5 /arch/arm/mach-exynos | |
parent | ARM: actions: remove boot_lock and pen_release (diff) | |
download | linux-6213f70e7c10fd4a01b65bad3826648fc78df8a8.tar.xz linux-6213f70e7c10fd4a01b65bad3826648fc78df8a8.zip |
ARM: smp: remove arch-provided "pen_release"
Consolidating the "pen_release" stuff amongst the various SoC
implementations gives credence to having a CPU holding pen for
secondary CPUs. However, this is far from the truth.
Many SoC implementations cargo-cult copied various bits of the pen
release implementation from the initial Realview/Versatile Express
implementation without understanding what it was or why it existed.
The reason it existed is because these are _development_ platforms,
and some board firmware is unable to individually control the
startup of secondary CPUs. Moreover, they do not have a way to
power down or reset secondary CPUs for hot-unplug. Hence, the
pen_release implementation was designed for ARM Ltd's development
platforms to provide a working implementation, even though it is
very far from what is required.
It was decided a while back to reduce the duplication by consolidating
the "pen_release" variable, but this only made the situation worse -
we have ended up with several implementations that read this variable
but do not write it - again, showing the cargo-cult mentality at work,
lack of proper review of new code, and in some cases a lack of testing.
While it would be preferable to remove pen_release entirely from the
kernel, this is not possible without help from the SoC maintainers,
which seems to be lacking. However, I want to remove pen_release from
arch code to remove the credence that having it gives.
This patch removes pen_release from the arch code entirely, adding
private per-SoC definitions for it instead, and explicitly stating
that write_pen_release() is cargo-cult copied and should not be
copied any further. Rename write_pen_release() in a similar fashion
as well.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-exynos')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-exynos/headsmp.S | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c | 31 |
2 files changed, 19 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/headsmp.S b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/headsmp.S index 005695c9bf40..0ac2cb9a7355 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/headsmp.S +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/headsmp.S @@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ ENDPROC(exynos4_secondary_startup) .align 2 1: .long . - .long pen_release + .long exynos_pen_release diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c index c39ffd2e2fe6..3795412c0189 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/platsmp.c @@ -28,6 +28,9 @@ extern void exynos4_secondary_startup(void); +/* XXX exynos_pen_release is cargo culted code - DO NOT COPY XXX */ +volatile int exynos_pen_release = -1; + #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU static inline void cpu_leave_lowpower(u32 core_id) { @@ -57,7 +60,7 @@ static inline void platform_do_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, int *spurious) wfi(); - if (pen_release == core_id) { + if (exynos_pen_release == core_id) { /* * OK, proper wakeup, we're done */ @@ -228,15 +231,17 @@ void exynos_core_restart(u32 core_id) } /* - * Write pen_release in a way that is guaranteed to be visible to all - * observers, irrespective of whether they're taking part in coherency + * XXX CARGO CULTED CODE - DO NOT COPY XXX + * + * Write exynos_pen_release in a way that is guaranteed to be visible to + * all observers, irrespective of whether they're taking part in coherency * or not. This is necessary for the hotplug code to work reliably. */ -static void write_pen_release(int val) +static void exynos_write_pen_release(int val) { - pen_release = val; + exynos_pen_release = val; smp_wmb(); - sync_cache_w(&pen_release); + sync_cache_w(&exynos_pen_release); } static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(boot_lock); @@ -247,7 +252,7 @@ static void exynos_secondary_init(unsigned int cpu) * let the primary processor know we're out of the * pen, then head off into the C entry point */ - write_pen_release(-1); + exynos_write_pen_release(-1); /* * Synchronise with the boot thread. @@ -322,12 +327,12 @@ static int exynos_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) /* * The secondary processor is waiting to be released from * the holding pen - release it, then wait for it to flag - * that it has been released by resetting pen_release. + * that it has been released by resetting exynos_pen_release. * - * Note that "pen_release" is the hardware CPU core ID, whereas + * Note that "exynos_pen_release" is the hardware CPU core ID, whereas * "cpu" is Linux's internal ID. */ - write_pen_release(core_id); + exynos_write_pen_release(core_id); if (!exynos_cpu_power_state(core_id)) { exynos_cpu_power_up(core_id); @@ -376,13 +381,13 @@ static int exynos_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) else arch_send_wakeup_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu)); - if (pen_release == -1) + if (exynos_pen_release == -1) break; udelay(10); } - if (pen_release != -1) + if (exynos_pen_release != -1) ret = -ETIMEDOUT; /* @@ -392,7 +397,7 @@ static int exynos_boot_secondary(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle) fail: spin_unlock(&boot_lock); - return pen_release != -1 ? ret : 0; + return exynos_pen_release != -1 ? ret : 0; } static void __init exynos_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus) |