ARM: ux500: reform Ux500 family names

Counting the U9540 and the new U8540 as a U8500 family member
does not work. Instead, split the function in two:

cpu_is_u8500_family() covering U8500 and U8520
cpu_is_ux540_family() covering U9540 and U8540

This works much better in practice. Update users to keep the
same behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/include/mach/id.h b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/include/mach/id.h
index d1240e458a60..c7fcf694a32c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/include/mach/id.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/include/mach/id.h
@@ -46,14 +46,24 @@ static inline bool __attribute_const__ cpu_is_u8520(void)
 	return dbx500_partnumber() == 0x8520;
 }
 
+static inline bool cpu_is_u8500_family(void)
+{
+	return cpu_is_u8500() || cpu_is_u8520();
+}
+
 static inline bool __attribute_const__ cpu_is_u9540(void)
 {
 	return dbx500_partnumber() == 0x9540;
 }
 
-static inline bool cpu_is_u8500_family(void)
+static inline bool __attribute_const__ cpu_is_u8540(void)
+{
+	return dbx500_partnumber() == 0x8540;
+}
+
+static inline bool cpu_is_ux540_family(void)
 {
-	return cpu_is_u8500() || cpu_is_u9540();
+	return cpu_is_u9540() || cpu_is_u8540();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -97,12 +107,7 @@ static inline bool cpu_is_u8500v21(void)
 
 static inline bool cpu_is_u8500v20_or_later(void)
 {
-	/*
-	 * U9540 has so much in common with U8500 that is is considered a
-	 * U8500 variant.
-	 */
-	return cpu_is_u9540() ||
-		(cpu_is_u8500() && !cpu_is_u8500v10() && !cpu_is_u8500v11());
+	return (cpu_is_u8500() && !cpu_is_u8500v10() && !cpu_is_u8500v11());
 }
 
 static inline bool ux500_is_svp(void)