diff options
author | Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> | 2013-11-25 17:16:25 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> | 2013-11-25 23:12:14 +0100 |
commit | 33cb667a00f841fa036ad79f1aaaf7d6380c971d (patch) | |
tree | 54675506d32ac62b8e8593abb98e629b4ffb8adc /arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c | |
parent | ARM: tegra: Provide dummy powergate implementation (diff) | |
download | linux-33cb667a00f841fa036ad79f1aaaf7d6380c971d.tar.xz linux-33cb667a00f841fa036ad79f1aaaf7d6380c971d.zip |
ARM: vexpress/TC2: Implement MCPM power_down_finish()
This patch implements the power_down_finish() method for TC2, to
enable the kernel to confirm when CPUs are safely powered down.
The information required for determining when a CPU is parked
cannot be obtained from any single place, so a few sources of
information must be combined:
* mcpm_cpu_power_down() must be pending for the CPU, so that we
don't get confused by false STANDBYWFI positives arising from
CPUidle. This is detected by waiting for the tc2_pm use count
for the target CPU to reach 0.
* Either the SPC must report that the CPU has asserted
STANDBYWFI, or the TC2 tile's reset control logic must be
holding the CPU in reset.
Just checking for STANDBYWFI is not sufficient, because this
signal is not latched when the the cluster is clamped off and
powered down: the relevant status bits just drop to zero. This
means that STANDBYWFI status cannot be used for reliable
detection of the last CPU in a cluster reaching WFI.
This patch is required in order for kexec to work with MCPM on TC2.
MCPM code was changed in commit 0de0d6467525 ('ARM: 7848/1: mcpm:
Implement cpu_kill() to synchronise on powerdown'), and since then it
will hit a WARN_ON_ONCE() due to power_down_finish not being implemented
on the TC2 platform.
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c | 66 |
1 files changed, 61 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c index 05a364c5077a..29e7785a54bc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/tc2_pm.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ * published by the Free Software Foundation. */ +#include <linux/delay.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/kernel.h> @@ -32,11 +33,17 @@ #include "spc.h" /* SCC conf registers */ +#define RESET_CTRL 0x018 +#define RESET_A15_NCORERESET(cpu) (1 << (2 + (cpu))) +#define RESET_A7_NCORERESET(cpu) (1 << (16 + (cpu))) + #define A15_CONF 0x400 #define A7_CONF 0x500 #define SYS_INFO 0x700 #define SPC_BASE 0xb00 +static void __iomem *scc; + /* * We can't use regular spinlocks. In the switcher case, it is possible * for an outbound CPU to call power_down() after its inbound counterpart @@ -190,6 +197,55 @@ static void tc2_pm_power_down(void) tc2_pm_down(0); } +static int tc2_core_in_reset(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + u32 mask = cluster ? + RESET_A7_NCORERESET(cpu) + : RESET_A15_NCORERESET(cpu); + + return !(readl_relaxed(scc + RESET_CTRL) & mask); +} + +#define POLL_MSEC 10 +#define TIMEOUT_MSEC 1000 + +static int tc2_pm_power_down_finish(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int cluster) +{ + unsigned tries; + + pr_debug("%s: cpu %u cluster %u\n", __func__, cpu, cluster); + BUG_ON(cluster >= TC2_CLUSTERS || cpu >= TC2_MAX_CPUS_PER_CLUSTER); + + for (tries = 0; tries < TIMEOUT_MSEC / POLL_MSEC; ++tries) { + /* + * Only examine the hardware state if the target CPU has + * caught up at least as far as tc2_pm_down(): + */ + if (ACCESS_ONCE(tc2_pm_use_count[cpu][cluster]) == 0) { + pr_debug("%s(cpu=%u, cluster=%u): RESET_CTRL = 0x%08X\n", + __func__, cpu, cluster, + readl_relaxed(scc + RESET_CTRL)); + + /* + * We need the CPU to reach WFI, but the power + * controller may put the cluster in reset and + * power it off as soon as that happens, before + * we have a chance to see STANDBYWFI. + * + * So we need to check for both conditions: + */ + if (tc2_core_in_reset(cpu, cluster) || + ve_spc_cpu_in_wfi(cpu, cluster)) + return 0; /* success: the CPU is halted */ + } + + /* Otherwise, wait and retry: */ + msleep(POLL_MSEC); + } + + return -ETIMEDOUT; /* timeout */ +} + static void tc2_pm_suspend(u64 residency) { unsigned int mpidr, cpu, cluster; @@ -232,10 +288,11 @@ static void tc2_pm_powered_up(void) } static const struct mcpm_platform_ops tc2_pm_power_ops = { - .power_up = tc2_pm_power_up, - .power_down = tc2_pm_power_down, - .suspend = tc2_pm_suspend, - .powered_up = tc2_pm_powered_up, + .power_up = tc2_pm_power_up, + .power_down = tc2_pm_power_down, + .power_down_finish = tc2_pm_power_down_finish, + .suspend = tc2_pm_suspend, + .powered_up = tc2_pm_powered_up, }; static bool __init tc2_pm_usage_count_init(void) @@ -269,7 +326,6 @@ static void __naked tc2_pm_power_up_setup(unsigned int affinity_level) static int __init tc2_pm_init(void) { int ret, irq; - void __iomem *scc; u32 a15_cluster_id, a7_cluster_id, sys_info; struct device_node *np; |