diff options
author | Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com> | 2009-07-25 03:43:25 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | paul <paul@twilight.(none)> | 2009-07-25 03:43:25 +0200 |
commit | 58cda884ecc87dcce18d463b0c8bd928dae63ad8 (patch) | |
tree | 7bae55dfa93ba324c7478f5affa11ac66e2cab1a /arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c | |
parent | Linux 2.6.31-rc4 (diff) | |
download | linux-58cda884ecc87dcce18d463b0c8bd928dae63ad8.tar.xz linux-58cda884ecc87dcce18d463b0c8bd928dae63ad8.zip |
OMAP3 SDRC: add support for 2 SDRAM chip selects
Some OMAP3 boards (Beagle Cx, Overo, RX51, Pandora) have 2
SDRAM parts connected to the SDRC.
This patch adds the following:
- add a new argument of type omap_sdrc_params struct*
to omap2_init_common_hw and omap2_sdrc_init for the 2nd CS params
- adapted the OMAP boards files to the new prototype of
omap2_init_common_hw
- add the SDRC 2nd CS registers offsets defines
- adapt the sram sleep code to configure the SDRC for the 2nd CS
Note: If the 2nd param to omap2_init_common_hw is NULL, then the
parameters are not programmed into the SDRC CS1 registers
Tested on 3430 SDP and Beagleboard rev C2 and B5, with
suspend/resume and frequency changes (cpufreq).
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jpihet@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c | 30 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c index 4ea73804d21e..4e781c99f0eb 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c @@ -373,20 +373,26 @@ static inline int omap243x_sram_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 -static u32 (*_omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll)(u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl, - u32 sdrc_actim_ctrla, - u32 sdrc_actim_ctrlb, - u32 m2, u32 unlock_dll, - u32 f, u32 sdrc_mr, u32 inc); -u32 omap3_configure_core_dpll(u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl, u32 sdrc_actim_ctrla, - u32 sdrc_actim_ctrlb, u32 m2, u32 unlock_dll, - u32 f, u32 sdrc_mr, u32 inc) +static u32 (*_omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll)( + u32 m2, u32 unlock_dll, u32 f, u32 inc, + u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl_0, u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_0, + u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_0, u32 sdrc_mr_0, + u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl_1, u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_1, + u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_1, u32 sdrc_mr_1); + +u32 omap3_configure_core_dpll(u32 m2, u32 unlock_dll, u32 f, u32 inc, + u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl_0, u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_0, + u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_0, u32 sdrc_mr_0, + u32 sdrc_rfr_ctrl_1, u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_1, + u32 sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_1, u32 sdrc_mr_1) { BUG_ON(!_omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll); - return _omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll(sdrc_rfr_ctrl, - sdrc_actim_ctrla, - sdrc_actim_ctrlb, m2, - unlock_dll, f, sdrc_mr, inc); + return _omap3_sram_configure_core_dpll( + m2, unlock_dll, f, inc, + sdrc_rfr_ctrl_0, sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_0, + sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_0, sdrc_mr_0, + sdrc_rfr_ctrl_1, sdrc_actim_ctrl_a_1, + sdrc_actim_ctrl_b_1, sdrc_mr_1); } /* REVISIT: Should this be same as omap34xx_sram_init() after off-idle? */ |