clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/fsyscall_gtod_data.h b/arch/ia64/kernel/fsyscall_gtod_data.h
index 146b15b5fec3..dcc514917731 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/fsyscall_gtod_data.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/fsyscall_gtod_data.h
@@ -9,15 +9,15 @@ struct fsyscall_gtod_data_t {
 	seqcount_t	seq;
 	struct timespec	wall_time;
 	struct timespec monotonic_time;
-	cycle_t		clk_mask;
+	u64		clk_mask;
 	u32		clk_mult;
 	u32		clk_shift;
 	void		*clk_fsys_mmio;
-	cycle_t		clk_cycle_last;
+	u64		clk_cycle_last;
 } ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct itc_jitter_data_t {
 	int		itc_jitter;
-	cycle_t		itc_lastcycle;
+	u64		itc_lastcycle;
 } ____cacheline_aligned;