summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>2008-04-12 00:21:35 +0200
committerTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>2008-04-12 00:21:35 +0200
commit98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac (patch)
tree5d248fa7ec872548e43ed2acb864d701adc65f42 /arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
parent[IA64] Itanium Spec updates (diff)
downloadlinux-98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac.tar.xz
linux-98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac.zip
[IA64] Fix NUMA configuration issue
There is a NUMA memory configuration issue in 2.6.24: A 2-node machine of ours has got the following memory layout: Node 0: 0 - 2 Gbytes Node 0: 4 - 8 Gbytes Node 1: 8 - 16 Gbytes Node 0: 16 - 18 Gbytes "efi_memmap_init()" merges the three last ranges into one. "register_active_ranges()" is called as follows: efi_memmap_walk(register_active_ranges, NULL); i.e. once for the 4 - 18 Gbytes range. It picks up the node number from the start address, and registers all the memory for the node #0. "register_active_ranges()" should be called as follows to make sure there is no merged address range at its entry: efi_memmap_walk(filter_memory, register_active_ranges); "filter_memory()" is similar to "filter_rsvd_memory()", but the reserved memory ranges are not filtered out. Signed-off-by: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c b/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
index ffee1ea00bb0..96d5fbfa44a4 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
+++ b/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ void __init find_memory(void)
mem_data[node].min_pfn = ~0UL;
}
- efi_memmap_walk(register_active_ranges, NULL);
+ efi_memmap_walk(filter_memory, register_active_ranges);
/*
* Initialize the boot memory maps in reverse order since that's