diff options
author | Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net> | 2008-04-12 00:21:35 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> | 2008-04-12 00:21:35 +0200 |
commit | 98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac (patch) | |
tree | 5d248fa7ec872548e43ed2acb864d701adc65f42 /arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | |
parent | [IA64] Itanium Spec updates (diff) | |
download | linux-98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac.tar.xz linux-98075d245a5bc4aeebc2e9f16fa8b089a5c200ac.zip |
[IA64] Fix NUMA configuration issue
There is a NUMA memory configuration issue in 2.6.24:
A 2-node machine of ours has got the following memory layout:
Node 0: 0 - 2 Gbytes
Node 0: 4 - 8 Gbytes
Node 1: 8 - 16 Gbytes
Node 0: 16 - 18 Gbytes
"efi_memmap_init()" merges the three last ranges into one.
"register_active_ranges()" is called as follows:
efi_memmap_walk(register_active_ranges, NULL);
i.e. once for the 4 - 18 Gbytes range. It picks up the node
number from the start address, and registers all the memory for
the node #0.
"register_active_ranges()" should be called as follows to
make sure there is no merged address range at its entry:
efi_memmap_walk(filter_memory, register_active_ranges);
"filter_memory()" is similar to "filter_rsvd_memory()",
but the reserved memory ranges are not filtered out.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Menyhart <Zoltan.Menyhart@bull.net>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c b/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c index ffee1ea00bb0..96d5fbfa44a4 100644 --- a/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c +++ b/arch/ia64/mm/discontig.c @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ void __init find_memory(void) mem_data[node].min_pfn = ~0UL; } - efi_memmap_walk(register_active_ranges, NULL); + efi_memmap_walk(filter_memory, register_active_ranges); /* * Initialize the boot memory maps in reverse order since that's |