summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndré Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com>2009-11-14 16:09:05 +0100
committerJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>2009-12-04 15:39:55 +0100
commitaf901ca181d92aac3a7dc265144a9081a86d8f39 (patch)
tree380054af22521144fbe1364c3bcd55ad24c9bde4 /arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src
parentdrivers/ata/libata-sff.c: comment spelling fixes (diff)
downloadlinux-af901ca181d92aac3a7dc265144a9081a86d8f39.tar.xz
linux-af901ca181d92aac3a7dc265144a9081a86d8f39.zip
tree-wide: fix assorted typos all over the place
That is "success", "unknown", "through", "performance", "[re|un]mapping" , "access", "default", "reasonable", "[con]currently", "temperature" , "channel", "[un]used", "application", "example","hierarchy", "therefore" , "[over|under]flow", "contiguous", "threshold", "enough" and others. Signed-off-by: André Goddard Rosa <andre.goddard@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src')
-rw-r--r--arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/fpsp.S28
-rw-r--r--arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/pfpsp.S26
2 files changed, 27 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/fpsp.S b/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/fpsp.S
index 6c1a9a217887..73613b5f1ee5 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/fpsp.S
+++ b/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/fpsp.S
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ fovfl_ovfl_on:
bra.l _real_ovfl
-# overflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. therefore,
+# overflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. Therefore,
# we must jump to real_inex().
fovfl_inex_on:
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ funfl_unfl_on2:
bra.l _real_unfl
-# undeflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. therefore,
+# underflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. Therefore,
# we must jump to real_inex().
funfl_inex_on:
@@ -2963,7 +2963,7 @@ iea_disabled:
tst.w %d0 # is instr fmovm?
bmi.b iea_dis_fmovm # yes
-# instruction is using an extended precision immediate operand. therefore,
+# instruction is using an extended precision immediate operand. Therefore,
# the total instruction length is 16 bytes.
iea_dis_immed:
mov.l &0x10,%d0 # 16 bytes of instruction
@@ -9624,7 +9624,7 @@ sok_dnrm:
bge.b sok_norm2 # thank goodness no
# the multiply factor that we're trying to create should be a denorm
-# for the multiply to work. therefore, we're going to actually do a
+# for the multiply to work. Therefore, we're going to actually do a
# multiply with a denorm which will cause an unimplemented data type
# exception to be put into the machine which will be caught and corrected
# later. we don't do this with the DENORMs above because this method
@@ -12216,7 +12216,7 @@ fin_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow or inexact is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fin_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -12746,7 +12746,7 @@ fdiv_zero_load_p:
#
# The destination was In Range and the source was a ZERO. The result,
-# therefore, is an INF w/ the proper sign.
+# Therefore, is an INF w/ the proper sign.
# So, determine the sign and return a new INF (w/ the j-bit cleared).
#
global fdiv_inf_load # global for fsgldiv
@@ -12996,7 +12996,7 @@ fneg_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fneg_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -13611,7 +13611,7 @@ fabs_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fabs_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -14973,7 +14973,7 @@ fadd_zero_2:
#
# the ZEROes have opposite signs:
-# - therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding modes are RN,RZ, or RP.
+# - Therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding modes are RN,RZ, or RP.
# - -ZERO is returned in the case of RM.
#
fadd_zero_2_chk_rm:
@@ -15425,7 +15425,7 @@ fsub_zero_2:
#
# the ZEROes have the same signs:
-# - therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding mode is RN,RZ, or RP
+# - Therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding mode is RN,RZ, or RP
# - -ZERO is returned in the case of RM.
#
fsub_zero_2_chk_rm:
@@ -15693,7 +15693,7 @@ fsqrt_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fsqrt_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -21000,7 +21000,7 @@ fout_pack_type:
tst.l %d0
bne.b fout_pack_set
# "mantissa" is all zero which means that the answer is zero. but, the '040
-# algorithm allows the exponent to be non-zero. the 881/2 do not. therefore,
+# algorithm allows the exponent to be non-zero. the 881/2 do not. Therefore,
# if the mantissa is zero, I will zero the exponent, too.
# the question now is whether the exponents sign bit is allowed to be non-zero
# for a zero, also...
@@ -21743,7 +21743,7 @@ denorm_set_stky:
rts
# #
-# dnrm_lp(): normalize exponent/mantissa to specified threshhold #
+# dnrm_lp(): normalize exponent/mantissa to specified threshold #
# #
# INPUT: #
# %a0 : points to the operand to be denormalized #
@@ -22402,7 +22402,7 @@ unnorm_shift:
bgt.b unnorm_nrm_zero # yes; denorm only until exp = 0
#
-# exponent would not go < 0. therefore, number stays normalized
+# exponent would not go < 0. Therefore, number stays normalized
#
sub.w %d0, %d1 # shift exponent value
mov.w FTEMP_EX(%a0), %d0 # load old exponent
diff --git a/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/pfpsp.S b/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/pfpsp.S
index 51b9f7d879dd..e71ba0ab013c 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/pfpsp.S
+++ b/arch/m68k/ifpsp060/src/pfpsp.S
@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ fovfl_ovfl_on:
bra.l _real_ovfl
-# overflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. therefore,
+# overflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. Therefore,
# we must jump to real_inex().
fovfl_inex_on:
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ funfl_unfl_on2:
bra.l _real_unfl
-# undeflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. therefore,
+# underflow occurred but is disabled. meanwhile, inexact is enabled. Therefore,
# we must jump to real_inex().
funfl_inex_on:
@@ -2962,7 +2962,7 @@ iea_disabled:
tst.w %d0 # is instr fmovm?
bmi.b iea_dis_fmovm # yes
-# instruction is using an extended precision immediate operand. therefore,
+# instruction is using an extended precision immediate operand. Therefore,
# the total instruction length is 16 bytes.
iea_dis_immed:
mov.l &0x10,%d0 # 16 bytes of instruction
@@ -5865,7 +5865,7 @@ denorm_set_stky:
rts
# #
-# dnrm_lp(): normalize exponent/mantissa to specified threshhold #
+# dnrm_lp(): normalize exponent/mantissa to specified threshold #
# #
# INPUT: #
# %a0 : points to the operand to be denormalized #
@@ -6524,7 +6524,7 @@ unnorm_shift:
bgt.b unnorm_nrm_zero # yes; denorm only until exp = 0
#
-# exponent would not go < 0. therefore, number stays normalized
+# exponent would not go < 0. Therefore, number stays normalized
#
sub.w %d0, %d1 # shift exponent value
mov.w FTEMP_EX(%a0), %d0 # load old exponent
@@ -7901,7 +7901,7 @@ fout_pack_type:
tst.l %d0
bne.b fout_pack_set
# "mantissa" is all zero which means that the answer is zero. but, the '040
-# algorithm allows the exponent to be non-zero. the 881/2 do not. therefore,
+# algorithm allows the exponent to be non-zero. the 881/2 do not. Therefore,
# if the mantissa is zero, I will zero the exponent, too.
# the question now is whether the exponents sign bit is allowed to be non-zero
# for a zero, also...
@@ -8647,7 +8647,7 @@ fin_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow or inexact is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fin_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -9177,7 +9177,7 @@ fdiv_zero_load_p:
#
# The destination was In Range and the source was a ZERO. The result,
-# therefore, is an INF w/ the proper sign.
+# Therefore, is an INF w/ the proper sign.
# So, determine the sign and return a new INF (w/ the j-bit cleared).
#
global fdiv_inf_load # global for fsgldiv
@@ -9427,7 +9427,7 @@ fneg_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fneg_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -10042,7 +10042,7 @@ fabs_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fabs_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)
@@ -11404,7 +11404,7 @@ fadd_zero_2:
#
# the ZEROes have opposite signs:
-# - therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding modes are RN,RZ, or RP.
+# - Therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding modes are RN,RZ, or RP.
# - -ZERO is returned in the case of RM.
#
fadd_zero_2_chk_rm:
@@ -11856,7 +11856,7 @@ fsub_zero_2:
#
# the ZEROes have the same signs:
-# - therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding mode is RN,RZ, or RP
+# - Therefore, we return +ZERO if the rounding mode is RN,RZ, or RP
# - -ZERO is returned in the case of RM.
#
fsub_zero_2_chk_rm:
@@ -12124,7 +12124,7 @@ fsqrt_sd_unfl_dis:
#
# operand will underflow AND underflow is enabled.
-# therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
+# Therefore, we must return the result rounded to extended precision.
#
fsqrt_sd_unfl_ena:
mov.l FP_SCR0_HI(%a6),FP_SCR1_HI(%a6)