Merge branch 'hash' of git://ftp.sciencehorizons.net/linux

Pull string hash improvements from George Spelvin:
 "This series does several related things:

   - Makes the dcache hash (fs/namei.c) useful for general kernel use.

     (Thanks to Bruce for noticing the zero-length corner case)

   - Converts the string hashes in <linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h> to use the
     above.

   - Avoids 64-bit multiplies in hash_64() on 32-bit platforms.  Two
     32-bit multiplies will do well enough.

   - Rids the world of the bad hash multipliers in hash_32.

     This finishes the job started in commit 689de1d6ca95 ("Minimal
     fix-up of bad hashing behavior of hash_64()")

     The vast majority of Linux architectures have hardware support for
     32x32-bit multiply and so derive no benefit from "simplified"
     multipliers.

     The few processors that do not (68000, h8/300 and some models of
     Microblaze) have arch-specific implementations added.  Those
     patches are last in the series.

   - Overhauls the dcache hash mixing.

     The patch in commit 0fed3ac866ea ("namei: Improve hash mixing if
     CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS") was an off-the-cuff suggestion.
     Replaced with a much more careful design that's simultaneously
     faster and better.  (My own invention, as there was noting suitable
     in the literature I could find.  Comments welcome!)

   - Modify the hash_name() loop to skip the initial HASH_MIX().  This
     would let us salt the hash if we ever wanted to.

   - Sort out partial_name_hash().

     The hash function is declared as using a long state, even though
     it's truncated to 32 bits at the end and the extra internal state
     contributes nothing to the result.  And some callers do odd things:

      - fs/hfs/string.c only allocates 32 bits of state
      - fs/hfsplus/unicode.c uses it to hash 16-bit unicode symbols not bytes

   - Modify bytemask_from_count to handle inputs of 1..sizeof(long)
     rather than 0..sizeof(long)-1.  This would simplify users other
     than full_name_hash"

  Special thanks to Bruce Fields for testing and finding bugs in v1.  (I
  learned some humbling lessons about "obviously correct" code.)

  On the arch-specific front, the m68k assembly has been tested in a
  standalone test harness, I've been in contact with the Microblaze
  maintainers who mostly don't care, as the hardware multiplier is never
  omitted in real-world applications, and I haven't heard anything from
  the H8/300 world"

* 'hash' of git://ftp.sciencehorizons.net/linux:
  h8300: Add <asm/hash.h>
  microblaze: Add <asm/hash.h>
  m68k: Add <asm/hash.h>
  <linux/hash.h>: Add support for architecture-specific functions
  fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function
  Eliminate bad hash multipliers from hash_32() and  hash_64()
  Change hash_64() return value to 32 bits
  <linux/sunrpc/svcauth.h>: Define hash_str() in terms of hashlen_string()
  fs/namei.c: Add hashlen_string() function
  Pull out string hash to <linux/stringhash.h>

2 files changed, 60 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
index 8ace920ca24a..967260f2eb1c 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
+++ b/arch/m68k/Kconfig.cpu
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ config M68000
 	select CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED
 	select GENERIC_CSUM
 	select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS
+	select HAVE_ARCH_HASH
 	help
 	  The Freescale (was Motorola) 68000 CPU is the first generation of
 	  the well known M68K family of processors. The CPU core as well as
diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/hash.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/hash.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6407af84a994
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/hash.h
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+#ifndef _ASM_HASH_H
+#define _ASM_HASH_H
+
+/*
+ * If CONFIG_M68000=y (original mc68000/010), this file is #included
+ * to work around the lack of a MULU.L instruction.
+ */
+
+#define HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 1
+/*
+ * While it would be legal to substitute a different hash operation
+ * entirely, let's keep it simple and just use an optimized multiply
+ * by GOLDEN_RATIO_32 = 0x61C88647.
+ *
+ * The best way to do that appears to be to multiply by 0x8647 with
+ * shifts and adds, and use mulu.w to multiply the high half by 0x61C8.
+ *
+ * Because the 68000 has multi-cycle shifts, this addition chain is
+ * chosen to minimise the shift distances.
+ *
+ * Despite every attempt to spoon-feed it simple operations, GCC
+ * 6.1.1 doggedly insists on doing annoying things like converting
+ * "lsl.l #2,<reg>" (12 cycles) to two adds (8+8 cycles).
+ *
+ * It also likes to notice two shifts in a row, like "a = x << 2" and
+ * "a <<= 7", and convert that to "a = x << 9".  But shifts longer
+ * than 8 bits are extra-slow on m68k, so that's a lose.
+ *
+ * Since the 68000 is a very simple in-order processor with no
+ * instruction scheduling effects on execution time, we can safely
+ * take it out of GCC's hands and write one big asm() block.
+ *
+ * Without calling overhead, this operation is 30 bytes (14 instructions
+ * plus one immediate constant) and 166 cycles.
+ *
+ * (Because %2 is fetched twice, it can't be postincrement, and thus it
+ * can't be a fully general "g" or "m".  Register is preferred, but
+ * offsettable memory or immediate will work.)
+ */
+static inline u32 __attribute_const__ __hash_32(u32 x)
+{
+	u32 a, b;
+
+	asm(   "move.l %2,%0"	/* a = x * 0x0001 */
+	"\n	lsl.l #2,%0"	/* a = x * 0x0004 */
+	"\n	move.l %0,%1"
+	"\n	lsl.l #7,%0"	/* a = x * 0x0200 */
+	"\n	add.l %2,%0"	/* a = x * 0x0201 */
+	"\n	add.l %0,%1"	/* b = x * 0x0205 */
+	"\n	add.l %0,%0"	/* a = x * 0x0402 */
+	"\n	add.l %0,%1"	/* b = x * 0x0607 */
+	"\n	lsl.l #5,%0"	/* a = x * 0x8040 */
+	: "=&d,d" (a), "=&r,r" (b)
+	: "r,roi?" (x));	/* a+b = x*0x8647 */
+
+	return ((u16)(x*0x61c8) << 16) + a + b;
+}
+
+#endif	/* _ASM_HASH_H */