clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t

There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is
unambiguous.

Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script:

@rem@
@@
-typedef u64 cycle_t;

@fix@
typedef cycle_t;
@@
-cycle_t
+u64

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c
index 9e954959f605..1d6fad50fa76 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/timer.c
@@ -190,17 +190,17 @@ static u64 xilinx_clock_read(void)
 	return read_fn(timer_baseaddr + TCR1);
 }
 
-static cycle_t xilinx_read(struct clocksource *cs)
+static u64 xilinx_read(struct clocksource *cs)
 {
 	/* reading actual value of timer 1 */
-	return (cycle_t)xilinx_clock_read();
+	return (u64)xilinx_clock_read();
 }
 
 static struct timecounter xilinx_tc = {
 	.cc = NULL,
 };
 
-static cycle_t xilinx_cc_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
+static u64 xilinx_cc_read(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
 {
 	return xilinx_read(NULL);
 }