diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2015-08-27 04:42:33 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2015-09-15 01:47:34 +0200 |
commit | 504a33749971c36c54ba5ccb1364872dee1f17a7 (patch) | |
tree | 46f15d186ca8efd35dd6e420a41195dbe1556fbf /arch/microblaze | |
parent | ACPI / gpio: Split acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() (diff) | |
download | linux-504a33749971c36c54ba5ccb1364872dee1f17a7.tar.xz linux-504a33749971c36c54ba5ccb1364872dee1f17a7.zip |
ACPI / property: Extend device_get_next_child_node() to data-only nodes
Make device_get_next_child_node() work with ACPI data-only subnodes
introduced previously.
Namely, replace acpi_get_next_child() with acpi_get_next_subnode()
that can handle (and return) child device objects as well as child
data-only subnodes of the given device and modify the ACPI part
of the GPIO subsystem to handle data-only subnodes returned by it.
To that end, introduce acpi_node_get_gpiod() taking a struct
fwnode_handle pointer as the first argument. That argument may
point to an ACPI device object as well as to a data-only subnode
and the function should do the right thing (ie. look for the matching
GPIO descriptor correctly) in either case.
Next, modify fwnode_get_named_gpiod() to use acpi_node_get_gpiod()
instead of acpi_get_gpiod_by_index() which automatically causes
devm_get_gpiod_from_child() to work with ACPI data-only subnodes
that may be returned by device_get_next_child_node() which in turn
is required by the users of that function (the gpio_keys_polled
and gpio-leds drivers).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/microblaze')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions