powerpc/perf: e500 support

This implements perf_event support for the Freescale embedded performance
monitor, based on the existing perf_event.c that supports server/classic
chips.

Some limitations:
- Performance monitor interrupts are regular EE interrupts, and thus you
  can't profile places with interrupts disabled.  We may want to implement
  soft IRQ-disabling, with perfmon interrupts exempted and treated as NMIs.
- When trying to schedule multiple event groups at once, and using
  restricted events, situations could arise where scheduling fails even
  though it would be possible.  Consider three groups, each with two events.
  One group has restricted events, the others don't.  The two non-restricted
  groups are scheduled, then one is removed, which happens to occupy the two
  counters that can't do restricted events.  The remaining non-restricted
  group will not be moved to the non-restricted-capable counters to make
  room if the restricted group tries to be scheduled.

Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>

1 files changed, 129 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/e500-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/e500-pmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7c07de0d8943
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/e500-pmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+/*
+ * Performance counter support for e500 family processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright 2008-2009 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corporation.
+ * Copyright 2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/reg.h>
+#include <asm/cputable.h>
+
+/*
+ * Map of generic hardware event types to hardware events
+ * Zero if unsupported
+ */
+static int e500_generic_events[] = {
+	[PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES] = 1,
+	[PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS] = 2,
+	[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES] = 41, /* Data L1 cache reloads */
+	[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS] = 12,
+	[PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES] = 15,
+};
+
+#define C(x)	PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_##x
+
+/*
+ * Table of generalized cache-related events.
+ * 0 means not supported, -1 means nonsensical, other values
+ * are event codes.
+ */
+static int e500_cache_events[C(MAX)][C(OP_MAX)][C(RESULT_MAX)] = {
+	/*
+	 * D-cache misses are not split into read/write/prefetch;
+	 * use raw event 41.
+	 */
+	[C(L1D)] = {		/* 	RESULT_ACCESS	RESULT_MISS */
+		[C(OP_READ)] = {	27,		0	},
+		[C(OP_WRITE)] = {	28,		0	},
+		[C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {	29,		0	},
+	},
+	[C(L1I)] = {		/* 	RESULT_ACCESS	RESULT_MISS */
+		[C(OP_READ)] = {	2,		60	},
+		[C(OP_WRITE)] = {	-1,		-1	},
+		[C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {	0,		0	},
+	},
+	/*
+	 * Assuming LL means L2, it's not a good match for this model.
+	 * It allocates only on L1 castout or explicit prefetch, and
+	 * does not have separate read/write events (but it does have
+	 * separate instruction/data events).
+	 */
+	[C(LL)] = {		/* 	RESULT_ACCESS	RESULT_MISS */
+		[C(OP_READ)] = {	0,		0	},
+		[C(OP_WRITE)] = {	0,		0	},
+		[C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {	0,		0	},
+	},
+	/*
+	 * There are data/instruction MMU misses, but that's a miss on
+	 * the chip's internal level-one TLB which is probably not
+	 * what the user wants.  Instead, unified level-two TLB misses
+	 * are reported here.
+	 */
+	[C(DTLB)] = {		/* 	RESULT_ACCESS	RESULT_MISS */
+		[C(OP_READ)] = {	26,		66	},
+		[C(OP_WRITE)] = {	-1,		-1	},
+		[C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {	-1,		-1	},
+	},
+	[C(BPU)] = {		/* 	RESULT_ACCESS	RESULT_MISS */
+		[C(OP_READ)] = {	12,		15 	},
+		[C(OP_WRITE)] = {	-1,		-1	},
+		[C(OP_PREFETCH)] = {	-1,		-1	},
+	},
+};
+
+static int num_events = 128;
+
+/* Upper half of event id is PMLCb, for threshold events */
+static u64 e500_xlate_event(u64 event_id)
+{
+	u32 event_low = (u32)event_id;
+	u64 ret;
+
+	if (event_low >= num_events)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = FSL_EMB_EVENT_VALID;
+
+	if (event_low >= 76 && event_low <= 81) {
+		ret |= FSL_EMB_EVENT_RESTRICTED;
+		ret |= event_id &
+		       (FSL_EMB_EVENT_THRESHMUL | FSL_EMB_EVENT_THRESH);
+	} else if (event_id &
+	           (FSL_EMB_EVENT_THRESHMUL | FSL_EMB_EVENT_THRESH)) {
+		/* Threshold requested on non-threshold event */
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static struct fsl_emb_pmu e500_pmu = {
+	.name			= "e500 family",
+	.n_counter		= 4,
+	.n_restricted		= 2,
+	.xlate_event		= e500_xlate_event,
+	.n_generic		= ARRAY_SIZE(e500_generic_events),
+	.generic_events		= e500_generic_events,
+	.cache_events		= &e500_cache_events,
+};
+
+static int init_e500_pmu(void)
+{
+	if (!cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (!strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc/e500mc"))
+		num_events = 256;
+	else if (strcmp(cur_cpu_spec->oprofile_cpu_type, "ppc/e500"))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	return register_fsl_emb_pmu(&e500_pmu);
+}
+
+arch_initcall(init_e500_pmu);