diff options
| author | Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> | 2021-05-20 15:50:45 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> | 2021-06-16 16:09:00 +0200 |
| commit | 69d4d6e5fd9f4e805280ad831932c3df7b9d7cc7 (patch) | |
| tree | 43fa12d74a15e793166972f23562a01d6f8637e3 /arch/powerpc/xmon | |
| parent | powerpc/lib/code-patching: Don't use struct 'ppc_inst' for runnable code in t... (diff) | |
| download | linux-69d4d6e5fd9f4e805280ad831932c3df7b9d7cc7.tar.xz linux-69d4d6e5fd9f4e805280ad831932c3df7b9d7cc7.zip | |
powerpc: Don't use 'struct ppc_inst' to reference instruction location
'struct ppc_inst' is an internal representation of an instruction, but
in-memory instructions are and will remain a table of 'u32' forever.
Replace all 'struct ppc_inst *' used for locating an instruction in
memory by 'u32 *'. This removes a lot of undue casts to 'struct
ppc_inst *'.
It also helps locating ab-use of 'struct ppc_inst' dereference.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
[mpe: Fix ppc_inst_next(), use u32 instead of unsigned int]
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7062722b087228e42cbd896e39bfdf526d6a340a.1621516826.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/xmon')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c index f73c10869e64..bd7ee794be92 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static long *xmon_fault_jmp[NR_CPUS]; /* Breakpoint stuff */ struct bpt { unsigned long address; - struct ppc_inst *instr; + u32 *instr; atomic_t ref_count; int enabled; unsigned long pad; @@ -946,11 +946,11 @@ static void insert_bpts(void) } patch_instruction(bp->instr, instr); - patch_instruction(ppc_inst_next(bp->instr, &instr), + patch_instruction(ppc_inst_next(bp->instr, bp->instr), ppc_inst(bpinstr)); if (bp->enabled & BP_CIABR) continue; - if (patch_instruction((struct ppc_inst *)bp->address, + if (patch_instruction((u32 *)bp->address, ppc_inst(bpinstr)) != 0) { printf("Couldn't write instruction at %lx, " "disabling breakpoint there\n", bp->address); @@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ static void remove_bpts(void) if (mread_instr(bp->address, &instr) && ppc_inst_equal(instr, ppc_inst(bpinstr)) && patch_instruction( - (struct ppc_inst *)bp->address, ppc_inst_read(bp->instr)) != 0) + (u32 *)bp->address, ppc_inst_read(bp->instr)) != 0) printf("Couldn't remove breakpoint at %lx\n", bp->address); } @@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ mread_instr(unsigned long adrs, struct ppc_inst *instr) if (setjmp(bus_error_jmp) == 0) { catch_memory_errors = 1; sync(); - *instr = ppc_inst_read((struct ppc_inst *)adrs); + *instr = ppc_inst_read((u32 *)adrs); sync(); /* wait a little while to see if we get a machine check */ __delay(200); |