diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> | 2016-03-10 12:54:08 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> | 2016-05-06 14:58:22 +0200 |
commit | e9d867a67fd03ccc07248ca4e9c2f74fed494d5b (patch) | |
tree | bd1e01ee5b5581203d3fa8397fd863c400cea2bc /arch/s390 | |
parent | Linux 4.6-rc6 (diff) | |
download | linux-e9d867a67fd03ccc07248ca4e9c2f74fed494d5b.tar.xz linux-e9d867a67fd03ccc07248ca4e9c2f74fed494d5b.zip |
sched: Allow per-cpu kernel threads to run on online && !active
In order to enable symmetric hotplug, we must mirror the online &&
!active state of cpu-down on the cpu-up side.
However, to retain sanity, limit this state to per-cpu kthreads.
Aside from the change to set_cpus_allowed_ptr(), which allow moving
the per-cpu kthreads on, the other critical piece is the cpu selection
for pinned tasks in select_task_rq(). This avoids dropping into
select_fallback_rq().
select_fallback_rq() cannot be allowed to select !active cpus because
its used to migrate user tasks away. And we do not want to move user
tasks onto cpus that are in transition.
Requested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jan H. Schönherr <jschoenh@amazon.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: rt@linutronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160301152303.GV6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c index 40a6b4f9c36c..7b89a7572100 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c @@ -832,7 +832,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle) pcpu_attach_task(pcpu, tidle); pcpu_start_fn(pcpu, smp_start_secondary, NULL); /* Wait until cpu puts itself in the online & active maps */ - while (!cpu_online(cpu) || !cpu_active(cpu)) + while (!cpu_online(cpu)) cpu_relax(); return 0; } |