[SPARC64] PCI: Use root list of pbm's instead of pci_controller_info's

The idea is to move more and more things into the pbm,
with the eventual goal of eliminating the pci_controller_info
entirely as there really isn't any need for it.

This stage of the transformations requires some reworking of
the PCI error interrupt handling.

It might be tricky to get rid of the pci_controller_info parenting for
a few reasons:

1) When we get an uncorrectable or correctable error we want
   to interrogate the IOMMU and streaming cache of both
   PBMs for error status.  These errors come from the UPA
   front-end which is shared between the two PBM PCI bus
   segments.

   Historically speaking this is why I choose the datastructure
   hierarchy of pci_controller_info-->pci_pbm_info

2) The probing does a portid/devhandle match to look for the
   'other' pbm, but this is entirely an artifact and can be
   eliminated trivially.

What we could do to solve #1 is to have a "buddy" pointer from one pbm
to another.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 34 deletions

diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_sun4v.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
index 1491ba330583..0a101cb22320 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_sun4v.c
@@ -677,29 +677,15 @@ static struct pci_ops pci_sun4v_ops = {
 };
 
 
-static void pbm_scan_bus(struct pci_controller_info *p,
-			 struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
-{
-	pbm->pci_bus = pci_scan_one_pbm(pbm);
-}
-
-static void pci_sun4v_scan_bus(struct pci_controller_info *p)
+static void pci_sun4v_scan_bus(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
 {
 	struct property *prop;
 	struct device_node *dp;
 
-	if ((dp = p->pbm_A.prom_node) != NULL) {
-		prop = of_find_property(dp, "66mhz-capable", NULL);
-		p->pbm_A.is_66mhz_capable = (prop != NULL);
-
-		pbm_scan_bus(p, &p->pbm_A);
-	}
-	if ((dp = p->pbm_B.prom_node) != NULL) {
-		prop = of_find_property(dp, "66mhz-capable", NULL);
-		p->pbm_B.is_66mhz_capable = (prop != NULL);
-
-		pbm_scan_bus(p, &p->pbm_B);
-	}
+	dp = pbm->prom_node;
+	prop = of_find_property(dp, "66mhz-capable", NULL);
+	pbm->is_66mhz_capable = (prop != NULL);
+	pbm->pci_bus = pci_scan_one_pbm(pbm);
 
 	/* XXX register error interrupt handlers XXX */
 }
@@ -1246,6 +1232,11 @@ static void pci_sun4v_pbm_init(struct pci_controller_info *p, struct device_node
 	else
 		pbm = &p->pbm_A;
 
+	pbm->next = pci_pbm_root;
+	pci_pbm_root = pbm;
+
+	pbm->scan_bus = pci_sun4v_scan_bus;
+
 	pbm->parent = p;
 	pbm->prom_node = dp;
 
@@ -1265,6 +1256,7 @@ static void pci_sun4v_pbm_init(struct pci_controller_info *p, struct device_node
 void sun4v_pci_init(struct device_node *dp, char *model_name)
 {
 	struct pci_controller_info *p;
+	struct pci_pbm_info *pbm;
 	struct iommu *iommu;
 	struct property *prop;
 	struct linux_prom64_registers *regs;
@@ -1276,18 +1268,9 @@ void sun4v_pci_init(struct device_node *dp, char *model_name)
 
 	devhandle = (regs->phys_addr >> 32UL) & 0x0fffffff;
 
-	for (p = pci_controller_root; p; p = p->next) {
-		struct pci_pbm_info *pbm;
-
-		if (p->pbm_A.prom_node && p->pbm_B.prom_node)
-			continue;
-
-		pbm = (p->pbm_A.prom_node ?
-		       &p->pbm_A :
-		       &p->pbm_B);
-
+	for (pbm = pci_pbm_root; pbm; pbm = pbm->next) {
 		if (pbm->devhandle == (devhandle ^ 0x40)) {
-			pci_sun4v_pbm_init(p, dp, devhandle);
+			pci_sun4v_pbm_init(pbm->parent, dp, devhandle);
 			return;
 		}
 	}
@@ -1317,12 +1300,8 @@ void sun4v_pci_init(struct device_node *dp, char *model_name)
 
 	p->pbm_B.iommu = iommu;
 
-	p->next = pci_controller_root;
-	pci_controller_root = p;
-
 	p->index = pci_num_controllers++;
 
-	p->scan_bus = pci_sun4v_scan_bus;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
 	p->setup_msi_irq = pci_sun4v_setup_msi_irq;
 	p->teardown_msi_irq = pci_sun4v_teardown_msi_irq;