tile: remove support for TILE64

This chip is no longer being actively developed for (it was superceded
by the TILEPro64 in 2008), and in any case the existing compiler and
toolchain in the community do not support it.  It's unlikely that the
kernel works with TILE64 at this point as the configuration has not been
tested in years.  The support is also awkward as it requires maintaining
a significant number of ifdefs.  So, just remove it altogether.

Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 53 deletions

diff --git a/arch/tile/mm/fault.c b/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
index 39c48cbe0a96..111d5a9b76f1 100644
--- a/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/tile/mm/fault.c
@@ -466,28 +466,15 @@ good_area:
 		}
 	}
 
-#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA() || CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
-	/*
-	 * If this was an asynchronous fault,
-	 * restart the appropriate engine.
-	 */
-	switch (fault_num) {
 #if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA()
+	/* If this was a DMA TLB fault, restart the DMA engine. */
+	switch (fault_num) {
 	case INT_DMATLB_MISS:
 	case INT_DMATLB_MISS_DWNCL:
 	case INT_DMATLB_ACCESS:
 	case INT_DMATLB_ACCESS_DWNCL:
 		__insn_mtspr(SPR_DMA_CTR, SPR_DMA_CTR__REQUEST_MASK);
 		break;
-#endif
-#if CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
-	case INT_SNITLB_MISS:
-	case INT_SNITLB_MISS_DWNCL:
-		__insn_mtspr(SPR_SNCTL,
-			     __insn_mfspr(SPR_SNCTL) &
-			     ~SPR_SNCTL__FRZPROC_MASK);
-		break;
-#endif
 	}
 #endif
 
@@ -804,10 +791,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int fault_num,
 	case INT_DMATLB_MISS:
 	case INT_DMATLB_MISS_DWNCL:
 #endif
-#if CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
-	case INT_SNITLB_MISS:
-	case INT_SNITLB_MISS_DWNCL:
-#endif
 		is_page_fault = 1;
 		break;
 
@@ -823,7 +806,7 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int fault_num,
 		panic("Bad fault number %d in do_page_fault", fault_num);
 	}
 
-#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA() || CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
+#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA()
 	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		struct async_tlb *async;
 		switch (fault_num) {
@@ -835,12 +818,6 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int fault_num,
 			async = &current->thread.dma_async_tlb;
 			break;
 #endif
-#if CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
-		case INT_SNITLB_MISS:
-		case INT_SNITLB_MISS_DWNCL:
-			async = &current->thread.sn_async_tlb;
-			break;
-#endif
 		default:
 			async = NULL;
 		}
@@ -873,14 +850,22 @@ void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int fault_num,
 }
 
 
-#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA() || CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
+#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA()
 /*
- * Check an async_tlb structure to see if a deferred fault is waiting,
- * and if so pass it to the page-fault code.
+ * This routine effectively re-issues asynchronous page faults
+ * when we are returning to user space.
  */
-static void handle_async_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
-				    struct async_tlb *async)
+void do_async_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+	struct async_tlb *async = &current->thread.dma_async_tlb;
+
+	/*
+	 * Clear thread flag early.  If we re-interrupt while processing
+	 * code here, we will reset it and recall this routine before
+	 * returning to user space.
+	 */
+	clear_thread_flag(TIF_ASYNC_TLB);
+
 	if (async->fault_num) {
 		/*
 		 * Clear async->fault_num before calling the page-fault
@@ -894,28 +879,7 @@ static void handle_async_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
 				  async->address, async->is_write);
 	}
 }
-
-/*
- * This routine effectively re-issues asynchronous page faults
- * when we are returning to user space.
- */
-void do_async_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Clear thread flag early.  If we re-interrupt while processing
-	 * code here, we will reset it and recall this routine before
-	 * returning to user space.
-	 */
-	clear_thread_flag(TIF_ASYNC_TLB);
-
-#if CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA()
-	handle_async_page_fault(regs, &current->thread.dma_async_tlb);
-#endif
-#if CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC()
-	handle_async_page_fault(regs, &current->thread.sn_async_tlb);
-#endif
-}
-#endif /* CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA() || CHIP_HAS_SN_PROC() */
+#endif /* CHIP_HAS_TILE_DMA() */
 
 
 void vmalloc_sync_all(void)