summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/tile
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2017-05-04 00:35:32 +0200
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2017-06-09 03:52:34 +0200
commitc350c008297643dad3c395c2fd92230142da5cf6 (patch)
tree731bff2816d661ee0c1015a6e5e4423ccfd87f7f /arch/tile
parentrcu: Move rcutiny.h to new empty/true/false-function style (diff)
downloadlinux-c350c008297643dad3c395c2fd92230142da5cf6.tar.xz
linux-c350c008297643dad3c395c2fd92230142da5cf6.zip
srcu: Prevent sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed counter wrap
If a given CPU never happens to ever start an SRCU grace period, the grace-period sequence counter might wrap. If this CPU were to decide to finally start a grace period, the state of its sdp->srcu_gp_seq_needed might make it appear that it has already requested this grace period, which would prevent starting the grace period. If no other CPU ever started a grace period again, this would look like a grace-period hang. Even if some other CPU took pity and started the needed grace period, the leaf rcu_node structure's ->srcu_data_have_cbs field won't have record of the fact that this CPU has a callback pending, which would look like a very localized grace-period hang. This might seem very unlikely, but SRCU grace periods can take less than a microsecond on small systems, which means that overflow can happen in much less than an hour on a 32-bit embedded system. And embedded systems are especially likely to have long-term idle CPUs. Therefore, it makes sense to prevent this scenario from happening. This commit therefore scans each srcu_data structure occasionally, with frequency controlled by the srcutree.counter_wrap_check kernel boot parameter. This parameter can be set to something like 255 in order to exercise the counter-wrap-prevention code. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/tile')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions