summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>2012-05-10 04:51:07 +0200
committerPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>2012-05-10 04:51:07 +0200
commit15f99cbd071aa402e113d342448603344a337046 (patch)
tree56f98892d1bd38029988eb8931e2321ef7e79aa0 /arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
parentsh64: Kill off unused trap_no/error_code from thread_struct. (diff)
parentsh: Add pinmux for sh7264 (diff)
downloadlinux-15f99cbd071aa402e113d342448603344a337046.tar.xz
linux-15f99cbd071aa402e113d342448603344a337046.zip
Merge branch 'sh/rsk-updates' into sh-latest
Conflicts: arch/sh/Kconfig Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c29
1 files changed, 24 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
index 0a44b90602b0..146bb6218eec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
* contact AMD for precise details and a CPU swap.
*
* See http://www.multimania.com/poulot/k6bug.html
- * http://www.amd.com/K6/k6docs/revgd.html
+ * and section 2.6.2 of "AMD-K6 Processor Revision Guide - Model 6"
+ * (Publication # 21266 Issue Date: August 1998)
*
* The following test is erm.. interesting. AMD neglected to up
* the chip setting when fixing the bug but they also tweaked some
@@ -94,7 +95,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd_k6(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
"system stability may be impaired when more than 32 MB are used.\n");
else
printk(KERN_CONT "probably OK (after B9730xxxx).\n");
- printk(KERN_INFO "Please see http://membres.lycos.fr/poulot/k6bug.html\n");
}
/* K6 with old style WHCR */
@@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);
/*
- * If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
- * so invoke platform-specific handler
+ * On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
+ * platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
+ * IDs of the CPU.
*/
- if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
+ if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);
if (!node_online(node)) {
@@ -579,6 +580,24 @@ static void __cpuinit init_amd(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
}
}
+ /* re-enable TopologyExtensions if switched off by BIOS */
+ if ((c->x86 == 0x15) &&
+ (c->x86_model >= 0x10) && (c->x86_model <= 0x1f) &&
+ !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
+ u64 val;
+
+ if (!rdmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, &val)) {
+ val |= 1ULL << 54;
+ wrmsrl_amd_safe(0xc0011005, val);
+ rdmsrl(0xc0011005, val);
+ if (val & (1ULL << 54)) {
+ set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT);
+ printk(KERN_INFO FW_INFO "CPU: Re-enabling "
+ "disabled Topology Extensions Support\n");
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
cpu_detect_cache_sizes(c);
/* Multi core CPU? */