diff options
author | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> | 2017-05-23 17:37:30 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-05-24 09:05:16 +0200 |
commit | 519fb5c3350d1b5225b27b1cac55144f79351718 (patch) | |
tree | 77801591c6ebd1d89b4ca941f3560b796e0dcd86 /arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | |
parent | Revert "x86/entry: Fix the end of the stack for newly forked tasks" (diff) | |
download | linux-519fb5c3350d1b5225b27b1cac55144f79351718.tar.xz linux-519fb5c3350d1b5225b27b1cac55144f79351718.zip |
x86/unwind: Add end-of-stack check for ftrace handlers
Dave Jones and Steven Rostedt reported unwinder warnings like the
following:
WARNING: kernel stack frame pointer at ffff8800bda0ff30 in sshd:1090 has bad value 000055b32abf1fa8
In both cases, the unwinder was attempting to unwind from an ftrace
handler into entry code. The callchain was something like:
syscall entry code
C function
ftrace handler
save_stack_trace()
The problem is that the unwinder's end-of-stack logic gets confused by
the way ftrace lays out the stack frame (with fentry enabled).
I was able to recreate this warning with:
echo call_usermodehelper_exec_async:stacktrace > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_ftrace_filter
(exit login session)
I considered fixing this by changing the ftrace code to rewrite the
stack to make the unwinder happy. But that seemed too intrusive after I
implemented it. Instead, just add another check to the unwinder's
end-of-stack logic to detect this special case.
Side note: We could probably get rid of these end-of-stack checks by
encoding the frame pointer for syscall entry just like we do for
interrupt entry. That would be simpler, but it would also be a lot more
intrusive since it would slightly affect the performance of every
syscall.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: c32c47c68a0a ("x86/unwind: Warn on bad frame pointer")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/671ba22fbc0156b8f7e0cfa5ab2a795e08bc37e1.1495553739.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c index 82c6d7f1fd73..b9389d72b2f7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_frame.c @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ static inline unsigned long *last_frame(struct unwind_state *state) return (unsigned long *)task_pt_regs(state->task) - 2; } +static bool is_last_frame(struct unwind_state *state) +{ + return state->bp == last_frame(state); +} + #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 #define GCC_REALIGN_WORDS 3 #else @@ -115,16 +120,15 @@ static inline unsigned long *last_aligned_frame(struct unwind_state *state) return last_frame(state) - GCC_REALIGN_WORDS; } -static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state) +static bool is_last_aligned_frame(struct unwind_state *state) { unsigned long *last_bp = last_frame(state); unsigned long *aligned_bp = last_aligned_frame(state); /* - * We have to check for the last task frame at two different locations - * because gcc can occasionally decide to realign the stack pointer and - * change the offset of the stack frame in the prologue of a function - * called by head/entry code. Examples: + * GCC can occasionally decide to realign the stack pointer and change + * the offset of the stack frame in the prologue of a function called + * by head/entry code. Examples: * * <start_secondary>: * push %edi @@ -141,11 +145,38 @@ static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state) * push %rbp * mov %rsp,%rbp * - * Note that after aligning the stack, it pushes a duplicate copy of - * the return address before pushing the frame pointer. + * After aligning the stack, it pushes a duplicate copy of the return + * address before pushing the frame pointer. + */ + return (state->bp == aligned_bp && *(aligned_bp + 1) == *(last_bp + 1)); +} + +static bool is_last_ftrace_frame(struct unwind_state *state) +{ + unsigned long *last_bp = last_frame(state); + unsigned long *last_ftrace_bp = last_bp - 3; + + /* + * When unwinding from an ftrace handler of a function called by entry + * code, the stack layout of the last frame is: + * + * bp + * parent ret addr + * bp + * function ret addr + * parent ret addr + * pt_regs + * ----------------- */ - return (state->bp == last_bp || - (state->bp == aligned_bp && *(aligned_bp+1) == *(last_bp+1))); + return (state->bp == last_ftrace_bp && + *state->bp == *(state->bp + 2) && + *(state->bp + 1) == *(state->bp + 4)); +} + +static bool is_last_task_frame(struct unwind_state *state) +{ + return is_last_frame(state) || is_last_aligned_frame(state) || + is_last_ftrace_frame(state); } /* |