summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/x86/kvm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>2023-11-25 09:33:59 +0100
committerSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>2023-12-01 16:52:08 +0100
commit250ce1b4d21a94f910c3df5141ff6434ea92524e (patch)
treee04b9c330262a9edbb83ce90a729ee8f200ab279 /arch/x86/kvm
parentKVM: x86/mmu: remove unnecessary "bool shared" argument from iterators (diff)
downloadlinux-250ce1b4d21a94f910c3df5141ff6434ea92524e.tar.xz
linux-250ce1b4d21a94f910c3df5141ff6434ea92524e.zip
KVM: x86/mmu: always take tdp_mmu_pages_lock
It is cheap to take tdp_mmu_pages_lock in all write-side critical sections. We already do it all the time when zapping with read_lock(), so it is not a problem to do it from the kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() path (aka kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all(), aka VM destruction and MMU notifier release). Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231125083400.1399197-4-pbonzini@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/kvm')
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c24
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index c6dc09acea12..6ae19b4ee5b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -75,12 +75,6 @@ static void tdp_mmu_free_sp_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
void kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root)
{
- /*
- * Either read or write is okay, but mmu_lock must be held because
- * writers are not required to take tdp_mmu_pages_lock.
- */
- lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&root->tdp_mmu_root_count))
return;
@@ -281,28 +275,18 @@ static void tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
*
* @kvm: kvm instance
* @sp: the page to be removed
- * @shared: This operation may not be running under the exclusive use of
- * the MMU lock and the operation must synchronize with other
- * threads that might be adding or removing pages.
*/
-static void tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
- bool shared)
+static void tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
{
tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
if (!sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed)
return;
- if (shared)
- spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
- else
- lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
-
+ spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = false;
untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
-
- if (shared)
- spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
}
/**
@@ -331,7 +315,7 @@ static void handle_removed_pt(struct kvm *kvm, tdp_ptep_t pt, bool shared)
trace_kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page(sp);
- tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(kvm, sp, shared);
+ tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(kvm, sp);
for (i = 0; i < SPTE_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++) {
tdp_ptep_t sptep = pt + i;