x86/pkeys: Allocation/free syscalls

This patch adds two new system calls:

	int pkey_alloc(unsigned long flags, unsigned long init_access_rights)
	int pkey_free(int pkey);

These implement an "allocator" for the protection keys
themselves, which can be thought of as analogous to the allocator
that the kernel has for file descriptors.  The kernel tracks
which numbers are in use, and only allows operations on keys that
are valid.  A key which was not obtained by pkey_alloc() may not,
for instance, be passed to pkey_mprotect().

These system calls are also very important given the kernel's use
of pkeys to implement execute-only support.  These help ensure
that userspace can never assume that it has control of a key
unless it first asks the kernel.  The kernel does not promise to
preserve PKRU (right register) contents except for allocated
pkeys.

The 'init_access_rights' argument to pkey_alloc() specifies the
rights that will be established for the returned pkey.  For
instance:

	pkey = pkey_alloc(flags, PKEY_DENY_WRITE);

will allocate 'pkey', but also sets the bits in PKRU[1] such that
writing to 'pkey' is already denied.

The kernel does not prevent pkey_free() from successfully freeing
in-use pkeys (those still assigned to a memory range by
pkey_mprotect()).  It would be expensive to implement the checks
for this, so we instead say, "Just don't do it" since sane
software will never do it anyway.

Any piece of userspace calling pkey_alloc() needs to be prepared
for it to fail.  Why?  pkey_alloc() returns the same error code
(ENOSPC) when there are no pkeys and when pkeys are unsupported.
They can be unsupported for a whole host of reasons, so apps must
be prepared for this.  Also, libraries or LD_PRELOADs might steal
keys before an application gets access to them.

This allocation mechanism could be implemented in userspace.
Even if we did it in userspace, we would still need additional
user/kernel interfaces to tell userspace which keys are being
used by the kernel internally (such as for execute-only
mappings).  Having the kernel provide this facility completely
removes the need for these additional interfaces, or having an
implementation of this in userspace at all.

Note that we have to make changes to all of the architectures
that do not use mman-common.h because we use the new
PKEY_DENY_ACCESS/WRITE macros in arch-independent code.

1. PKRU is the Protection Key Rights User register.  It is a
   usermode-accessible register that controls whether writes
   and/or access to each individual pkey is allowed or denied.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: luto@kernel.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160729163015.444FE75F@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
index e8c474451928..e6113bbb56e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -21,8 +21,19 @@
 
 int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	bool need_to_set_mm_pkey = false;
+	int execute_only_pkey = mm->context.execute_only_pkey;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* Do we need to assign a pkey for mm's execute-only maps? */
+	if (execute_only_pkey == -1) {
+		/* Go allocate one to use, which might fail */
+		execute_only_pkey = mm_pkey_alloc(mm);
+		if (execute_only_pkey < 0)
+			return -1;
+		need_to_set_mm_pkey = true;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We do not want to go through the relatively costly
 	 * dance to set PKRU if we do not need to.  Check it
@@ -32,22 +43,33 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	 * can make fpregs inactive.
 	 */
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (fpregs_active() &&
-	    !__pkru_allows_read(read_pkru(), PKEY_DEDICATED_EXECUTE_ONLY)) {
+	if (!need_to_set_mm_pkey &&
+	    fpregs_active() &&
+	    !__pkru_allows_read(read_pkru(), execute_only_pkey)) {
 		preempt_enable();
-		return PKEY_DEDICATED_EXECUTE_ONLY;
+		return execute_only_pkey;
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
-	ret = arch_set_user_pkey_access(current, PKEY_DEDICATED_EXECUTE_ONLY,
+
+	/*
+	 * Set up PKRU so that it denies access for everything
+	 * other than execution.
+	 */
+	ret = arch_set_user_pkey_access(current, execute_only_pkey,
 			PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS);
 	/*
 	 * If the PKRU-set operation failed somehow, just return
 	 * 0 and effectively disable execute-only support.
 	 */
-	if (ret)
-		return 0;
+	if (ret) {
+		mm_set_pkey_free(mm, execute_only_pkey);
+		return -1;
+	}
 
-	return PKEY_DEDICATED_EXECUTE_ONLY;
+	/* We got one, store it and use it from here on out */
+	if (need_to_set_mm_pkey)
+		mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey;
+	return execute_only_pkey;
 }
 
 static inline bool vma_is_pkey_exec_only(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
@@ -55,7 +77,7 @@ static inline bool vma_is_pkey_exec_only(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	/* Do this check first since the vm_flags should be hot */
 	if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC)) != VM_EXEC)
 		return false;
-	if (vma_pkey(vma) != PKEY_DEDICATED_EXECUTE_ONLY)
+	if (vma_pkey(vma) != vma->vm_mm->context.execute_only_pkey)
 		return false;
 
 	return true;