diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 17:11:08 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2011-02-16 17:11:08 +0100 |
commit | fd0435d8fb1d4e5771f9ae3af71f2a77c1f4bd09 (patch) | |
tree | 633e662f21d47ab162d3651d7b1c527ae0f458fe /arch/x86/mm | |
parent | x86-64, NUMA: Unify use of memblk in all init methods (diff) | |
download | linux-fd0435d8fb1d4e5771f9ae3af71f2a77c1f4bd09.tar.xz linux-fd0435d8fb1d4e5771f9ae3af71f2a77c1f4bd09.zip |
x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
Move the remaining memblk registration logic from acpi_scan_nodes() to
numa_register_memblks() and initmem_init().
This applies nodes_cover_memory() sanity check, memory node sorting
and node_online() checking, which were only applied to acpi, to all
init methods.
As all memblk registration is moved to common code, active range
clearing is moved to initmem_init() too and removed from bad_srat().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/mm')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 74 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c | 61 |
3 files changed, 68 insertions, 74 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c index d6d7aa4b98c6..9c9f46adf414 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/amdtopology_64.c @@ -262,12 +262,5 @@ void __init amd_fake_nodes(const struct bootnode *nodes, int nr_nodes) int __init amd_scan_nodes(void) { - int i; - - init_memory_mapping_high(); - for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) - setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end); - - numa_init_array(); return 0; } diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c index 552080e8472b..748c6b5bff6d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c @@ -287,6 +287,37 @@ setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) node_set_online(nodeid); } +/* + * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly + * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory. + */ +static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes) +{ + unsigned long numaram, e820ram; + int i; + + numaram = 0; + for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) { + unsigned long s = nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT; + unsigned long e = nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT; + numaram += e - s; + numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(i, s, e); + if ((long)numaram < 0) + numaram = 0; + } + + e820ram = max_pfn - + (memblock_x86_hole_size(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT) >> PAGE_SHIFT); + /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */ + if ((long)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) { + printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n", + (numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20, + (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20); + return 0; + } + return 1; +} + static int __init numa_register_memblks(void) { int i; @@ -349,6 +380,27 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(void) memblock_x86_register_active_regions(memblk_nodeid[i], node_memblk_range[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT, node_memblk_range[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT); + + /* for out of order entries */ + sort_node_map(); + if (!nodes_cover_memory(numa_nodes)) + return -EINVAL; + + init_memory_mapping_high(); + + /* Finally register nodes. */ + for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) + setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end); + + /* + * Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due to missing + * bootmem. + */ + for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) + if (!node_online(i)) + setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, + numa_nodes[i].end); + return 0; } @@ -714,16 +766,14 @@ static int dummy_numa_init(void) node_set(0, cpu_nodes_parsed); node_set(0, mem_nodes_parsed); numa_add_memblk(0, 0, (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT); + numa_nodes[0].start = 0; + numa_nodes[0].end = (u64)max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT; return 0; } static int dummy_scan_nodes(void) { - init_memory_mapping_high(); - setup_node_bootmem(0, 0, max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT); - numa_init_array(); - return 0; } @@ -759,6 +809,7 @@ void __init initmem_init(void) memset(node_memblk_range, 0, sizeof(node_memblk_range)); memset(memblk_nodeid, 0, sizeof(memblk_nodeid)); memset(numa_nodes, 0, sizeof(numa_nodes)); + remove_all_active_ranges(); if (numa_init[i]() < 0) continue; @@ -783,8 +834,19 @@ void __init initmem_init(void) if (numa_register_memblks() < 0) continue; - if (!scan_nodes[i]()) - return; + if (scan_nodes[i]() < 0) + continue; + + for (j = 0; j < nr_cpu_ids; j++) { + int nid = early_cpu_to_node(j); + + if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) + continue; + if (!node_online(nid)) + numa_clear_node(j); + } + numa_init_array(); + return; } BUG(); } diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c index 69f147116da7..4a2c33b0a48c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c @@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ static __init void bad_srat(void) numa_nodes[i].start = numa_nodes[i].end = 0; nodes_add[i].start = nodes_add[i].end = 0; } - remove_all_active_ranges(); } static __init inline int srat_disabled(void) @@ -259,35 +258,6 @@ acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_mem_affinity *ma) update_nodes_add(node, start, end); } -/* Sanity check to catch more bad SRATs (they are amazingly common). - Make sure the PXMs cover all memory. */ -static int __init nodes_cover_memory(const struct bootnode *nodes) -{ - int i; - unsigned long pxmram, e820ram; - - pxmram = 0; - for_each_node_mask(i, mem_nodes_parsed) { - unsigned long s = nodes[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT; - unsigned long e = nodes[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT; - pxmram += e - s; - pxmram -= __absent_pages_in_range(i, s, e); - if ((long)pxmram < 0) - pxmram = 0; - } - - e820ram = max_pfn - (memblock_x86_hole_size(0, max_pfn<<PAGE_SHIFT)>>PAGE_SHIFT); - /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */ - if ((long)(e820ram - pxmram) >= (1<<(20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) { - printk(KERN_ERR - "SRAT: PXMs only cover %luMB of your %luMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n", - (pxmram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20, - (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20); - return 0; - } - return 1; -} - void __init acpi_numa_arch_fixup(void) {} int __init x86_acpi_numa_init(void) @@ -303,39 +273,8 @@ int __init x86_acpi_numa_init(void) /* Use the information discovered above to actually set up the nodes. */ int __init acpi_scan_nodes(void) { - int i; - if (acpi_numa <= 0) return -1; - - /* for out of order entries in SRAT */ - sort_node_map(); - if (!nodes_cover_memory(numa_nodes)) { - bad_srat(); - return -1; - } - - init_memory_mapping_high(); - - /* Finally register nodes */ - for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) - setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, numa_nodes[i].end); - /* Try again in case setup_node_bootmem missed one due - to missing bootmem */ - for_each_node_mask(i, node_possible_map) - if (!node_online(i)) - setup_node_bootmem(i, numa_nodes[i].start, - numa_nodes[i].end); - - for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) { - int node = early_cpu_to_node(i); - - if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) - continue; - if (!node_online(node)) - numa_clear_node(i); - } - numa_init_array(); return 0; } |