diff options
author | Song Liu <song@kernel.org> | 2023-12-06 23:40:52 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2023-12-07 02:17:20 +0100 |
commit | 96d1b7c081c0c96cbe8901045f4ff15a2e9974a2 (patch) | |
tree | 1c42f14146f5308976355f4d3d84b4cb4e91a420 /arch/x86/net | |
parent | bpf, x86: Adjust arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline return value (diff) | |
download | linux-96d1b7c081c0c96cbe8901045f4ff15a2e9974a2.tar.xz linux-96d1b7c081c0c96cbe8901045f4ff15a2e9974a2.zip |
bpf: Add arch_bpf_trampoline_size()
This helper will be used to calculate the size of the trampoline before
allocating the memory.
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for arm64 and riscv64 can use
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() to check the trampoline fits in the image.
OTOH, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for s390 has to call the JIT process
twice, so it cannot use arch_bpf_trampoline_size().
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-6-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/x86/net')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 5f7528cac344..5d75069fdcc2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -2422,10 +2422,10 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog, * add rsp, 8 // skip eth_type_trans's frame * ret // return to its caller */ -int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *image_end, - const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, - struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, - void *func_addr) +static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *image_end, + const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, + struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, + void *func_addr) { int i, ret, nr_regs = m->nr_args, stack_size = 0; int regs_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, arg_stack_off, rbx_off; @@ -2678,6 +2678,38 @@ cleanup: return ret; } +int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *image_end, + const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, + struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, + void *func_addr) +{ + return __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(im, image, image_end, m, flags, tlinks, func_addr); +} + +int arch_bpf_trampoline_size(const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags, + struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks, void *func_addr) +{ + struct bpf_tramp_image im; + void *image; + int ret; + + /* Allocate a temporary buffer for __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). + * This will NOT cause fragmentation in direct map, as we do not + * call set_memory_*() on this buffer. + * + * We cannot use kvmalloc here, because we need image to be in + * module memory range. + */ + image = bpf_jit_alloc_exec(PAGE_SIZE); + if (!image) + return -ENOMEM; + + ret = __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(&im, image, image + PAGE_SIZE, m, flags, + tlinks, func_addr); + bpf_jit_free_exec(image); + return ret; +} + static int emit_bpf_dispatcher(u8 **pprog, int a, int b, s64 *progs, u8 *image, u8 *buf) { u8 *jg_reloc, *prog = *pprog; |