summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>2015-03-10 20:07:00 +0100
committerChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>2015-03-11 14:24:36 +0100
commit04b8dc85bf4a64517e3cf20e409eeaa503b15cc1 (patch)
treece074a61824c768147f911152c4af6dfa97ff9eb /arch
parentarm64: KVM: Fix stage-2 PGD allocation to have per-page refcounting (diff)
downloadlinux-04b8dc85bf4a64517e3cf20e409eeaa503b15cc1.tar.xz
linux-04b8dc85bf4a64517e3cf20e409eeaa503b15cc1.zip
arm64: KVM: Do not use pgd_index to index stage-2 pgd
The kernel's pgd_index macro is designed to index a normal, page sized array. KVM is a bit diffferent, as we can use concatenated pages to have a bigger address space (for example 40bit IPA with 4kB pages gives us an 8kB PGD. In the above case, the use of pgd_index will always return an index inside the first 4kB, which makes a guest that has memory above 0x8000000000 rather unhappy, as it spins forever in a page fault, whist the host happilly corrupts the lower pgd. The obvious fix is to get our own kvm_pgd_index that does the right thing(tm). Tested on X-Gene with a hacked kvmtool that put memory at a stupidly high address. Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h3
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c8
-rw-r--r--arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h2
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index c57c41dc7e87..4cf48c3aca13 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -149,13 +149,14 @@ static inline bool kvm_s2pmd_readonly(pmd_t *pmd)
(__boundary - 1 < (end) - 1)? __boundary: (end); \
})
+#define kvm_pgd_index(addr) pgd_index(addr)
+
static inline bool kvm_page_empty(void *ptr)
{
struct page *ptr_page = virt_to_page(ptr);
return page_count(ptr_page) == 1;
}
-
#define kvm_pte_table_empty(kvm, ptep) kvm_page_empty(ptep)
#define kvm_pmd_table_empty(kvm, pmdp) kvm_page_empty(pmdp)
#define kvm_pud_table_empty(kvm, pudp) (0)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
index a48a73c6b866..5656d79c5a44 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ static void unmap_range(struct kvm *kvm, pgd_t *pgdp,
phys_addr_t addr = start, end = start + size;
phys_addr_t next;
- pgd = pgdp + pgd_index(addr);
+ pgd = pgdp + kvm_pgd_index(addr);
do {
next = kvm_pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
if (!pgd_none(*pgd))
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ static void stage2_flush_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
phys_addr_t next;
pgd_t *pgd;
- pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + pgd_index(addr);
+ pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + kvm_pgd_index(addr);
do {
next = kvm_pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
stage2_flush_puds(kvm, pgd, addr, next);
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static pud_t *stage2_get_pud(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache *cache
pgd_t *pgd;
pud_t *pud;
- pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + pgd_index(addr);
+ pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + kvm_pgd_index(addr);
if (WARN_ON(pgd_none(*pgd))) {
if (!cache)
return NULL;
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ static void stage2_wp_range(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
pgd_t *pgd;
phys_addr_t next;
- pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + pgd_index(addr);
+ pgd = kvm->arch.pgd + kvm_pgd_index(addr);
do {
/*
* Release kvm_mmu_lock periodically if the memory region is
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index a099cd9cdef8..bbfb600fa822 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ static inline bool kvm_s2pmd_readonly(pmd_t *pmd)
#define PTRS_PER_S2_PGD (1 << PTRS_PER_S2_PGD_SHIFT)
#define S2_PGD_ORDER get_order(PTRS_PER_S2_PGD * sizeof(pgd_t))
+#define kvm_pgd_index(addr) (((addr) >> PGDIR_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_S2_PGD - 1))
+
/*
* If we are concatenating first level stage-2 page tables, we would have less
* than or equal to 16 pointers in the fake PGD, because that's what the