diff options
author | David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> | 2022-01-14 00:30:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> | 2022-01-19 18:09:07 +0100 |
commit | 6ff94f27fd47847d6ecb9302f9d3bd1ca991a17f (patch) | |
tree | 46b0b4efa5eaecca415e7a15f4f7490edc882101 /arch | |
parent | KVM: x86/mmu: Document and enforce MMU-writable and Host-writable invariants (diff) | |
download | linux-6ff94f27fd47847d6ecb9302f9d3bd1ca991a17f.tar.xz linux-6ff94f27fd47847d6ecb9302f9d3bd1ca991a17f.zip |
KVM: x86/mmu: Improve TLB flush comment in kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access()
Rewrite the comment in kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access() that explains
why it is safe to flush TLBs outside of the MMU lock after
write-protecting SPTEs for dirty logging. The current comment is a long
run-on sentence that was difficult to understand. In addition it was
specific to the shadow MMU (mentioning mmu_spte_update()) when the TDP
MMU has to handle this as well.
The new comment explains:
- Why the TLB flush is necessary at all.
- Why it is desirable to do the TLB flush outside of the MMU lock.
- Why it is safe to do the TLB flush outside of the MMU lock.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220113233020.3986005-5-dmatlack@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 31 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 1d275e9d76b5..593093b52395 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -5756,6 +5756,7 @@ static bool __kvm_zap_rmaps(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_t gfn_end) continue; flush = slot_handle_level_range(kvm, memslot, kvm_zap_rmapp, + PG_LEVEL_4K, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, start, end - 1, true, flush); } @@ -5825,15 +5826,27 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm, } /* - * We can flush all the TLBs out of the mmu lock without TLB - * corruption since we just change the spte from writable to - * readonly so that we only need to care the case of changing - * spte from present to present (changing the spte from present - * to nonpresent will flush all the TLBs immediately), in other - * words, the only case we care is mmu_spte_update() where we - * have checked Host-writable | MMU-writable instead of - * PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that means it does not depend on PT_WRITABLE_MASK - * anymore. + * Flush TLBs if any SPTEs had to be write-protected to ensure that + * guest writes are reflected in the dirty bitmap before the memslot + * update completes, i.e. before enabling dirty logging is visible to + * userspace. + * + * Perform the TLB flush outside the mmu_lock to reduce the amount of + * time the lock is held. However, this does mean that another CPU can + * now grab mmu_lock and encounter a write-protected SPTE while CPUs + * still have a writable mapping for the associated GFN in their TLB. + * + * This is safe but requires KVM to be careful when making decisions + * based on the write-protection status of an SPTE. Specifically, KVM + * also write-protects SPTEs to monitor changes to guest page tables + * during shadow paging, and must guarantee no CPUs can write to those + * page before the lock is dropped. As mentioned in the previous + * paragraph, a write-protected SPTE is no guarantee that CPU cannot + * perform writes. So to determine if a TLB flush is truly required, KVM + * will clear a separate software-only bit (MMU-writable) and skip the + * flush if-and-only-if this bit was already clear. + * + * See DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE for more details. */ if (flush) kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot); |