summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/base/dd.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>2019-01-22 19:39:10 +0100
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>2019-01-31 14:20:53 +0100
commit3451a495ef244a88ed6317a035299d835554d579 (patch)
treee35d679a4caec70f62f0c6bd6e638162ffc25d05 /drivers/base/dd.c
parentdriver core: Remove the link if there is no driver with AUTO flag (diff)
downloadlinux-3451a495ef244a88ed6317a035299d835554d579.tar.xz
linux-3451a495ef244a88ed6317a035299d835554d579.zip
driver core: Establish order of operations for device_add and device_del via bitflag
Add an additional bit flag to the device_private struct named "dead". This additional flag provides a guarantee that when a device_del is executed on a given interface an async worker will not attempt to attach the driver following the earlier device_del call. Previously this guarantee was not present and could result in the device_del call attempting to remove a driver from an interface only to have the async worker attempt to probe the driver later when it finally completes the asynchronous probe call. One additional change added was that I pulled the check for dev->driver out of the __device_attach_driver call and instead placed it in the __device_attach_async_helper call. This was motivated by the fact that the only other caller of this, __device_attach, had already taken the device_lock() and checked for dev->driver. Instead of testing for this twice in this path it makes more sense to just consolidate the dev->dead and dev->driver checks together into one set of checks. Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base/dd.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/base/dd.c22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 8ac10af17c00..636cd16b1b62 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -731,15 +731,6 @@ static int __device_attach_driver(struct device_driver *drv, void *_data)
bool async_allowed;
int ret;
- /*
- * Check if device has already been claimed. This may
- * happen with driver loading, device discovery/registration,
- * and deferred probe processing happens all at once with
- * multiple threads.
- */
- if (dev->driver)
- return -EBUSY;
-
ret = driver_match_device(drv, dev);
if (ret == 0) {
/* no match */
@@ -774,6 +765,15 @@ static void __device_attach_async_helper(void *_dev, async_cookie_t cookie)
device_lock(dev);
+ /*
+ * Check if device has already been removed or claimed. This may
+ * happen with driver loading, device discovery/registration,
+ * and deferred probe processing happens all at once with
+ * multiple threads.
+ */
+ if (dev->p->dead || dev->driver)
+ goto out_unlock;
+
if (dev->parent)
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev->parent);
@@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void __device_attach_async_helper(void *_dev, async_cookie_t cookie)
if (dev->parent)
pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
-
+out_unlock:
device_unlock(dev);
put_device(dev);
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int __driver_attach(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (dev->parent && dev->bus->need_parent_lock)
device_lock(dev->parent);
device_lock(dev);
- if (!dev->driver)
+ if (!dev->p->dead && !dev->driver)
driver_probe_device(drv, dev);
device_unlock(dev);
if (dev->parent && dev->bus->need_parent_lock)