diff options
| author | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> | 2016-09-15 17:38:38 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-09-17 00:58:00 +0200 |
| commit | 4df27c91893fd13eaa30e9b0bca74f317816f428 (patch) | |
| tree | 0e361f3fc2018ab46df24f3b676b6782edf0a63d /drivers/base/power/opp | |
| parent | Linux 4.8-rc6 (diff) | |
| download | linux-4df27c91893fd13eaa30e9b0bca74f317816f428.tar.xz linux-4df27c91893fd13eaa30e9b0bca74f317816f428.zip | |
PM / OPP: avoid maybe-uninitialized warning
When CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is set and we are building with -Wmaybe-uninitialized
enabled, we can get a warning for the opp core driver:
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c: In function 'dev_pm_opp_set_rate':
drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:560:8: warning: 'ou_volt_min' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
This has only now appeared as a result of commit 797da5598f3a ("PM / devfreq:
Add COMPILE_TEST for build coverage"), which makes the driver visible in
some configurations that didn't have it before.
The warning is a false positive that I got with gcc-6.1.1, but there is
a simple workaround in removing the local variables that we get warnings
for (all three are affected depending on the configuration). This also
makes the code easier to read.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base/power/opp')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/base/power/opp/core.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c index df0c70963d9e..4c7c6da7a989 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/core.c @@ -584,7 +584,6 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq) struct clk *clk; unsigned long freq, old_freq; unsigned long u_volt, u_volt_min, u_volt_max; - unsigned long ou_volt, ou_volt_min, ou_volt_max; int ret; if (unlikely(!target_freq)) { @@ -620,11 +619,7 @@ int dev_pm_opp_set_rate(struct device *dev, unsigned long target_freq) } old_opp = _find_freq_ceil(opp_table, &old_freq); - if (!IS_ERR(old_opp)) { - ou_volt = old_opp->u_volt; - ou_volt_min = old_opp->u_volt_min; - ou_volt_max = old_opp->u_volt_max; - } else { + if (IS_ERR(old_opp)) { dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to find current OPP for freq %lu (%ld)\n", __func__, old_freq, PTR_ERR(old_opp)); } @@ -683,7 +678,8 @@ restore_freq: restore_voltage: /* This shouldn't harm even if the voltages weren't updated earlier */ if (!IS_ERR(old_opp)) - _set_opp_voltage(dev, reg, ou_volt, ou_volt_min, ou_volt_max); + _set_opp_voltage(dev, reg, old_opp->u_volt, + old_opp->u_volt_min, old_opp->u_volt_max); return ret; } |