zram: check bd_openers instead of bd_holders

bd_holders is increased only when user open the device file as FMODE_EXCL
so if something opens zram0 as !FMODE_EXCL and request I/O while another
user reset zram0, we can see following warning.

  zram0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64424509440
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180823, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180824, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180825, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180826, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180827, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180828, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180829, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180830, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180831, lost async page write
  Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180832, lost async page write
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 1996 at fs/block_dev.c:57 __blkdev_put+0x1d7/0x210()
  Modules linked in:
  CPU: 11 PID: 1996 Comm: dd Not tainted 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202+ #1125
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
    dump_stack+0x45/0x57
    warn_slowpath_common+0x8a/0xc0
    warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
    __blkdev_put+0x1d7/0x210
    blkdev_put+0x50/0x130
    blkdev_close+0x25/0x30
    __fput+0xdf/0x1e0
    ____fput+0xe/0x10
    task_work_run+0xa7/0xe0
    do_notify_resume+0x49/0x60
    int_signal+0x12/0x17
  ---[ end trace 274fbbc5664827d2 ]---

The warning comes from bdev_write_node in blkdev_put path.

   static void bdev_write_inode(struct inode *inode)
   {
        spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
        while (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
                spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
                WARN_ON_ONCE(write_inode_now(inode, true)); <========= here.
                spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
        }
        spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
   }

The reason is dd process encounters I/O fails due to sudden block device
disappear so in filemap_check_errors in __writeback_single_inode returns
-EIO.

If we check bd_openers instead of bd_holders, we could address the
problem.  When I see the brd, it already have used it rather than
bd_holders so although I'm not a expert of block layer, it seems to be
better.

I can make following warning with below simple script.  In addition, I
added msleep(2000) below set_capacity(zram->disk, 0) after applying your
patch to make window huge(Kudos to Ganesh!)

script:

   echo $((60<<30)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
   setsid dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/zram0 &
   sleep 1
   setsid echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index 81ac8fd53340..0abcf4a31c78 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -810,7 +810,7 @@ static ssize_t reset_store(struct device *dev,
 
 	mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
 	/* Do not reset an active device! */
-	if (bdev->bd_holders) {
+	if (bdev->bd_openers) {
 		ret = -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}