summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>2008-09-05 23:05:33 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2008-09-06 15:33:31 +0200
commitdfdf748a61a21b7397b9f57c83de722de71dc56a (patch)
tree78fce25782a3a313a4d8db4464a849e66cc77fa8 /drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
parentntp: fix calculation of the next jiffie to trigger RTC sync (diff)
downloadlinux-dfdf748a61a21b7397b9f57c83de722de71dc56a.tar.xz
linux-dfdf748a61a21b7397b9f57c83de722de71dc56a.zip
clocksource, acpi_pm.c: use proper read function also in errata mode
On all hardware (some Intel ICH4, PIIX4 and PIIX4E chipsets) affected by a hardware errata there's about a 4.2% chance that initialization of the ACPI PMTMR fails. On those chipsets, we need to read out the timer value at least three times to get a correct result, for every once in a while (i.e. within a 3 ns window every 69.8 ns) the read returns a bogus result. During normal operation we work around this issue, but during initialization reading a bogus value may lead to -EINVAL even though the hardware is usable. Thanks to Andreas Mohr for spotting this issue. Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c b/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
index 5ca1d80de182..860d033bc74f 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/acpi_pm.c
@@ -151,13 +151,13 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SERVERWORKS, PCI_DEVICE_ID_SERVERWORKS_LE,
*/
static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
{
- u32 value1, value2;
+ cycle_t value1, value2;
unsigned long count, delta;
mach_prepare_counter();
- value1 = read_pmtmr();
+ value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
mach_countup(&count);
- value2 = read_pmtmr();
+ value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
delta = (value2 - value1) & ACPI_PM_MASK;
/* Check that the PMTMR delta is within 5% of what we expect */
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int verify_pmtmr_rate(void)
static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
{
- u32 value1, value2;
+ cycle_t value1, value2;
unsigned int i;
if (!pmtmr_ioport)
@@ -187,9 +187,9 @@ static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
clocksource_acpi_pm.shift);
/* "verify" this timing source: */
- value1 = read_pmtmr();
+ value1 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
for (i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
- value2 = read_pmtmr();
+ value2 = clocksource_acpi_pm.read();
if (value2 == value1)
continue;
if (value2 > value1)
@@ -197,11 +197,11 @@ static int __init init_acpi_pm_clocksource(void)
if ((value2 < value1) && ((value2) < 0xFFF))
goto pm_good;
printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had inconsistent results:"
- " 0x%#x, 0x%#x - aborting.\n", value1, value2);
+ " 0x%#llx, 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1, value2);
return -EINVAL;
}
printk(KERN_INFO "PM-Timer had no reasonable result:"
- " 0x%#x - aborting.\n", value1);
+ " 0x%#llx - aborting.\n", value1);
return -ENODEV;
pm_good: